I know that's the design, to shed the petals. But, I would still consider this successful and very lethal. I mean, look at partitions/accubonds arguably one of the most successful hunting bullets in history. They have expansion about equal to this, or maybe less!Yep, that's too slow, It should have shed all the petals
I know that's not the point of the hammers, but it is a comparable expansion, and maybe even a plus. Figuring it like this, when all the petals shed it's losing a bit of weight. Which is losing mass to continue penetration. But, When the petals stay attached (low velocity/long range impacts) it retains the mass to give you the deep penetration/pass through shots that so many people love for tracking.
They remind me of the Lehigh defense 194 ME. the way this acted at low velocity. Which in my limited experience is a serious deadly bullet. I had a complete pass through on a 200+ lb white tail at around 40 yards, insane blood trail, and a very dead deer. So, idk how they (hammers) handle the transonic transition, but they might be a very lethal bullet much farther than many people would consider. (Also this is not an opening about everyone's OPINION for hunting with slow/subsonic ammo)..
Btw BEAN, I'm not arguing my friend, just pointing out my opinion and very little experience.