sorry mate (not Australian but figured I'd try the lingo, don't cancel me for cultural appropriation please!
)
You're not replying to Steve who is
@RockyMtnMT . You're replying to the former 300prc now
@RockyMtnUT. I don't know what on earth he's trying to prove by changing his name and the way it's written to so closely imitate Steve's signature while making his picture a "failed" hammer bullet that could easily be created by just shooting one into gel at insufficient (and unrealistic) velocity, but it seems pretty overtly hostile of him and a touch childish to be honest. Steve's approach to this gent may not have been the most subtle (he never is
) but good grief the way this guy responded kind of proves Steve right about him. So again, Steve didn't tell you to see post 47, someone who has a problem with Steve did.
For all the talk I've heard about hammer supporters jacking threads, this thread that was explicitly seeking input about a hammer bullet sure got picked at by people with other plans for it.