MagnumManiac
Well-Known Member
This is the most notable outcome for this test.3. Once groups were taken to a sample of 33 shots, the WORST small sample size depth, actually became the best, most stable load.
I have been saying this here for years. If you take the load/seating depth that produces occasional .25" groups and swings to .5" groups the rest of the time, your aggregate will suffer. If you take a load that is constantly a 3/8" group performer, you'll be bounds ahead and your aggregate will show this.
Sample size and stability in loads, which translates to a wide node, will always win out in the end.
Cheers.