Ben Keller
Well-Known Member
Might want to take a look at this game changer from Gunwerks.
The "see-all open sight" is illegal in colorado-- I asked cpwand they said it's a no-no . I now have adjustable rear peep and front globe with fine crosshair insert.Very good information, I fell victim to the RUM with the BC stock twice. One for me and the other for my son, started off with the See-All sight. Good sight for some applications but after one Colorado Mule deer hunt we realized it wasn't for us. Our guns are in and out of the saddle scabbard a lot, and Id say its only good for 150-200 yards tops. But as usual it was getting late in the year and not enough time to start over finding a different sight.
Only thing Id like to do different than you did is use a Globe sight for the front, like the Lyman Target Globe. Did you consider this at all?
Thanks so much for all the great information as I've been going a bunch of research also on this topic. And now it sounds as if Remington really left us hanging out to dry!!!
Id sure like to talk to you about this topic in greater detail, could you give me a call or a text when you get a chance? 701-400-0966 Jeff
Nope, I asked about those too for CO -- no "glass", period is what I was toldCan't one use non electronic reflex sights in those states listed? Trijicon RMR duel illumination or similar?
The problem is, you arent actually reading ALL the rules and regulations-- you are just reading the "handbook" hand out. There is a real regulation book that is thick and full of legal mubojumbo wording. If you have questions, you can email cpw and they will turn the legal/ enforcement questions over to Bob Thompson and you'llget your legal answer for him. He is very blunt and not up for inperpretations/discussions of his answeres. But he will site the actual regulation wording for you.I believe in Colorado, there may be an exception for people with vision issues for 1-1X... with documentation but you will cause a ruckus if you go there! I've researched it... There's nothing in the documentation that says no glass and there is further misleading qualifying language that speaks to it and it does say iron sights only also but there are some old school options I believe - it's very misleading and the game wardens are as much in the dark as we are with how to interpret it.
For what it's worth, and after much anxiety because of this thread, I just mounted a Williams Precision Muzzleloader on a 700 UML composite stock - fits like a gem - no cheek rest issues - space for red dot forward for other states. Per this thread - this is what you want:
Thanks Williams!
If you have vision issues and use cheaters, get a pair with lower magnification, take the left lense out, and go both eyes open and play with that - I'm experimenting with that but you can infer through the fuzzy reticle of the globe but there may be a possible solution there to be found... Good luck - HTH
Somewhere in CO
We used to sit around the campfire years ago, about why don't they just combine the two....WORST THING EVER!Colorado game management and hunting rules and regs have gone to hell in a handbasket after takeover by the circus -er-parks management. Every year I've said "that's it, I've had it" to the next stupid thing they pull out of their backsides.
I am Still struggling working up a Colorado load for my RUM. I am shooting the Federal BOR Lock in 270gr with 77gr weighed of Black horn 209 and I am all over the place 10" groups but if I shoot the Remington sabot or the barns sabot I get 1" groups at 100 yards! Any suggestions???