Calvin45
Well-Known Member
Hey good points here…I didn't realize you were from South Dakota, not so far away (though far enough to make a difference no doubt).I'm not sure. You're not that far north of me. I'm in South Dakota. This is a land of 250-300lb mule deer as well. Plenty cold here and they've got plenty of fur by deer season. I remember back in 2012 punching 3 separate 338LM holes through a mule deer that is now on my wall. Two shots landed within an inch of its heart at 945yds... The 3rd shot finally dropped it in its tracks. That was when I gave up on 30 and 338cal for deer. Been light-switching animals with 7mm ever since and I'm one happy dude.
You can kill deer with a 22lr. You can kill deer with a 460 weatherby magnum. However, I do tend to think there are "right" tools for each job.
I'm feeling a tad silly, I realize there's one other important difference in our experience and it's almost certainly the explanation here: long range! I enjoy long range shooting and seek to get better at it, but where I live there's a fair bit of bush, not just open fields like the southern half of the province, and I've honestly never needed to take a shot at a deer beyond 400-500 yards or so. It's not that I'd be unwilling to, I've truly just never needed to.
I can totally see how at real long range like the 945 yards your talking about the smaller bores might perform better if for no other reason than that they can be made to stay above 2000 FPS impact velocity and actually perform as designed to on game. Some days I'm just a little slow on the draw mentally haha, I'll consider this cleared up!