This is easily solved by just buying a large amount of the same lot of ammo.Part of the problem is that you're asking for a consistency in ammo that doesn't exist, either. One lot to the next of high precision small bore ammo usually requires a range trip or two to dial in. The physics of how a tuner works is solid.
The physics makes sense on the surface, but breaks down when you look at what a small weight moved over a small distance actually does. It influences high order harmonics, which are completely hidden by the fundamental frequency and low order harmonics.
The stochastic nature of a rifle is very well documented. If you can't overcome that (which requires large sample sizes) you can't measure anything either. If the effect of a tuner is so minor its overcome by other variables in a 20 or 30 round group it's not actually helping anything.By insisting on a huge number of data points you're actually causing the results that you desire. I've no personal experience with tuners myself, but I'm surrounded by data acquisition and analysis every day at work. In R&D work you don't know what you've done unless you can measure it. Sometimes a large sample size works against you because you can't hold all of the other factors in the system to the same value(s) over a long run.
Last edited: