On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the hardest, how would you rate this build?
Please help and if possible use KISS principle.
I'm with you guys . please explain at a first grade level .
Have Confidence: If you guys reload, you have accomplished what is much harder to figure out and master than putting together a long range video system. All the hard work : electronics, antenna and video, have already been done by teams of engineers. This is equivalent to buying yourself a Christmas gift with some thinking and assembly required.
I'm not at all dismissing or diminishing what
@Lethal_Chica has done here, she is thinking outside the box and showing the way.
The two hardest things here --
- Exercising your Google Fu to find all the available kits and, if you're piecing it together, the ones that match specs. Amazon, because they want to sell you stuff, has done a lot of this for you.
- Getting the application to work on your phone / laptop. This was the hardest part many years ago, and has improved much in the past five years.
With the advancement of drone toys, there's a lot of kits available to put a camera on your drone and watch video over your phone. Yep, you can check on your neighbor and see what he's grilling!
There are dozens of articles on this, too.
The bare minimum you must have in a kit:
Target End:
- Camera
- Transmitter
- Antenna
- Power Supply (battery)
Bench End
- Receiver
- Antenna
- Device that converts video signal to something you can see
- Device you can look at the picture
- Software that will show the picture on your device
- Power Supply
Because of drones, there are a lot of kits now that you can really just plug together and be watching on your phone right away.
Due to FCC regs, transmission can happen on only a few frequency spectrums. Most typical ones are 5.8 and 2.4 gigahertz. Whatever the frequency, both ends must match.
Transmission distance has improved dramatically over the years.
Having set up WiFi industrial systems, I can tell you, using standard antennas, 2.4 GHz will go much farther than 5.8 GHz. Rain or 98% humidity can really mess with 2.4GHz.
Some systems will have the transmission wattage in their specs. As a general rule, more wattage means farther distance, but that also heavily depends on your antenna selection on both ends. For example, a high power signal out of an omnidirectional antenna (all directions) which hits a reflector nearby will actually hash the RF signal. Lesson, directional antennas if it's mounted on a metal building....
Remember, what it claims (1 mile!) is largely BS. One mile, in a vacuum, with absolutely nothing else, even radio signals, around. YMMV, but my rule of thumb has been take the claimed distance and cut it in half for a reasonable performance expectation. Good antennas make a world of difference.
The simplest solution in hardware and setup to go would be
camera --> WiFi transmitter --> WiFi receiver --> Bluetooth --> Phone
HTH