dok7mm
Well-Known Member
What is your chamber neck diameter, chamber OAL and loaded round neck diameter? Before you go to turning necks, you need to know this. Until you know these 3 measurements, I would avoid turning necks.
Folks,
I tried my best to research this question on the reloading page, but was unsuccessful in finding the answers to my specific question:
I have all the precision loading tools you could hope for. I will soon be reloading for .300 Win Mag and .300 RUM, using Berger Bullets.
I have a new inventory of 300 Remington cases in .300 RUM and 100 cases in the Winnie. I will soon be the proud owner of 300 rounds of Berger factory bullets--which, when shot, will be a source of what I suspect will be excellent cases for the future. I realize the Remington cases are not everyone's favorite.
My question is as follows: I have the Sinclair Case Sorting Tool and the Sinclair Concentricity Tool, each with its own dial indicator--as well as the Sinclair Case Turning Tool. It is my understanding (please correct me if I am wrong!) that I can use the Concentricity Tool to determine (1) Bullet runout on reloaded OR factory ammo, AND (2) neck concentricity with case, measured at the neck, either fired or re-sized). It is also my understanding that I can use the sorting tool to measure neck thickness for consistency.
So, OK--I am sitting down at my bench with say, 100 new cases in front of me. I measure them on both tools:
(1) At what point in non-concentricity of neck to body should I cull the case? Or should I resize the case no matter how out of whack it is, and remeasure?
(2) Same question with regard to inconsistency in neck thickness? Is there a recommended difference in thousandths at which one should give up on the case?
(3) I hear about "banana cases" and how they should be culled. I think the whole concept with which I am struggling here is this: How do you know when you have a non-salvageable case?
(4) With regards to neck turning, I realize that some people think is stupid EVER to turn and some who do it religiously. Question is: If you do turn case necks, after running an expander through the necks, how many thousandths out-of even
Thanks as always for your advice--sorry that it is such a one-way street!
Best regards,
Russ
lol 4 grains...must be a large target hunter( nothing wrong with that)
i use 1/2 spread...plus or minus 0.25 gr
i use 0.1 for serious target rifles
read my sig line
Folks,
I tried my best to research this question on the reloading page, but was unsuccessful in finding the answers to my specific question:
I have all the precision loading tools you could hope for. I will soon be reloading for .300 Win Mag and .300 RUM, using Berger Bullets.
I have a new inventory of 300 Remington cases in .300 RUM and 100 cases in the Winnie. I will soon be the proud owner of 300 rounds of Berger factory bullets--which, when shot, will be a source of what I suspect will be excellent cases for the future. I realize the Remington cases are not everyone's favorite.
My question is as follows: I have the Sinclair Case Sorting Tool and the Sinclair Concentricity Tool, each with its own dial indicator--as well as the Sinclair Case Turning Tool. It is my understanding (please correct me if I am wrong!) that I can use the Concentricity Tool to determine (1) Bullet runout on reloaded OR factory ammo, AND (2) neck concentricity with case, measured at the neck, either fired or re-sized). It is also my understanding that I can use the sorting tool to measure neck thickness for consistency.
So, OK--I am sitting down at my bench with say, 100 new cases in front of me. I measure them on both tools:
(1) At what point in non-concentricity of neck to body should I cull the case? Or should I resize the case no matter how out of whack it is, and remeasure?
(2) Same question with regard to inconsistency in neck thickness? Is there a recommended difference in thousandths at which one should give up on the case?
(3) I hear about "banana cases" and how they should be culled. I think the whole concept with which I am struggling here is this: How do you know when you have a non-salvageable case?
(4) With regards to neck turning, I realize that some people think is stupid EVER to turn and some who do it religiously. Question is: If you do turn case necks, after running an expander through the necks, how many thousandths out-of even
Thanks as always for your advice--sorry that it is such a one-way street!
Best regards,
Russ
Folks,
I tried my best to research this question on the reloading page, but was unsuccessful in finding the answers to my specific question:
I have all the precision loading tools you could hope for. I will soon be reloading for .300 Win Mag and .300 RUM, using Berger Bullets.
I have a new inventory of 300 Remington cases in .300 RUM and 100 cases in the Winnie. I will soon be the proud owner of 300 rounds of Berger factory bullets--which, when shot, will be a source of what I suspect will be excellent cases for the future. I realize the Remington cases are not everyone's favorite.
My question is as follows: I have the Sinclair Case Sorting Tool and the Sinclair Concentricity Tool, each with its own dial indicator--as well as the Sinclair Case Turning Tool. It is my understanding (please correct me if I am wrong!) that I can use the Concentricity Tool to determine (1) Bullet runout on reloaded OR factory ammo, AND (2) neck concentricity with case, measured at the neck, either fired or re-sized). It is also my understanding that I can use the sorting tool to measure neck thickness for consistency.
So, OK--I am sitting down at my bench with say, 100 new cases in front of me. I measure them on both tools:
(1) At what point in non-concentricity of neck to body should I cull the case? Or should I resize the case no matter how out of whack it is, and remeasure?
(2) Same question with regard to inconsistency in neck thickness? Is there a recommended difference in thousandths at which one should give up on the case?
(3) I hear about "banana cases" and how they should be culled. I think the whole concept with which I am struggling here is this: How do you know when you have a non-salvageable case?
(4) With regards to neck turning, I realize that some people think is stupid EVER to turn and some who do it religiously. Question is: If you do turn case necks, after running an expander through the necks, how many thousandths out-of even
Thanks as always for your advice--sorry that it is such a one-way street!
Best regards,
Russ
IMHO you'll be wasting brass if you cull over .0001 of run out. .0003 is acceptable and should still produce VGA results.Thanks for all your considered replies, Gentlemen. First a little bit of the back story: I have actually reloaded before—primarily during the 70s and 80s—creating pretty ordinary fodder for an AR-15 and some hunting rifles which I never shot beyond 200 yards. Everything worked. At the time, I was generally aware of more precise processes.
As I prepared for retirement, I stocked up on a really good and complete reloading setup.
Fast forward to the great Ammo and Component shortages attendant upon a certain previous political situation—Remington was about all I could get. (Also stocked up on RL22 and 25–together with all of its temperature sensitivity )
So yeah—I do understand what all of you are saying. Lapua would be nice, but they don't make cases for either of my two calibers. That's where I hope the Berger Win Mag 215 and 230 grain loaded Ammo I am stocking up on will come in—1: if the bullets work in my barrel, more's the better—and whether or not they do, I will have 300 presumably premium cases with which to work. (Norma? Nosler?—of course, Berger ain't talkin'!)
Meantime, my best (and expensive) hope is for Berger to grow their loaded product line to include .300 RUM. Wouldn't 230 grain OTMs be nice!
I did a little more research and here is what I am thinking as to my original question: Resize both new and fired brass—even though the new stuff is highly unlikely to even touch the sides of the dies. Then use the Concentricity Gauge to measure runout on the case necks—abandoning any cases over say, .001 of runout.
Folks,
I tried my best to research this question on the reloading page, but was unsuccessful in finding the answers to my specific question:
I have all the precision loading tools you could hope for. I will soon be reloading for .300 Win Mag and .300 RUM, using Berger Bullets.
I have a new inventory of 300 Remington cases in .300 RUM and 100 cases in the Winnie. I will soon be the proud owner of 300 rounds of Berger factory bullets--which, when shot, will be a source of what I suspect will be excellent cases for the future. I realize the Remington cases are not everyone's favorite.
My question is as follows: I have the Sinclair Case Sorting Tool and the Sinclair Concentricity Tool, each with its own dial indicator--as well as the Sinclair Case Turning Tool. It is my understanding (please correct me if I am wrong!) that I can use the Concentricity Tool to determine (1) Bullet runout on reloaded OR factory ammo, AND (2) neck concentricity with case, measured at the neck, either fired or re-sized). It is also my understanding that I can use the sorting tool to measure neck thickness for consistency.
So, OK--I am sitting down at my bench with say, 100 new cases in front of me. I measure them on both tools:
(1) At what point in non-concentricity of neck to body should I cull the case? Or should I resize the case no matter how out of whack it is, and remeasure?
(2) Same question with regard to inconsistency in neck thickness? Is there a recommended difference in thousandths at which one should give up on the case?
(3) I hear about "banana cases" and how they should be culled. I think the whole concept with which I am struggling here is this: How do you know when you have a non-salvageable case?
(4) With regards to neck turning, I realize that some people think is stupid EVER to turn and some who do it religiously. Question is: If you do turn case necks, after running an expander through the necks, how many thousandths out-of even
Thanks as always for your advice--sorry that it is such a one-way street!
Best regards,
Russ