ceg1963
Well-Known Member
Question or thought?
Why is it accepted that when one is buying an item from the internet classifieds, that the check or money order, must first appear before the seller ships the agreed item?
Both parties stand to lose equally if the other is not legit. Seller can lose the item, and the buyer can lose the cash.
What about a trade? Does the person who initiated the deal wait for the traded item to show up before their item is shipped?
I buy a bunch of stuff on line. Knock on wood, I've never been stiffed yet.
But it gets frustrating sending good money out, just to wait for "the trusted stranger" to produce their goods.
Why can't both parties ship simultaneously? I mean don't both parties in a legit deal stand to lose equally? So why does the buyer accept all of the risk?
An example: I agree to buy some item. I bust *** to the post office to buy a money order, ship it high speed to the seller, then the seller sits on it until it is convenient for them to ship.
I traded a rifle with a fella once, and we both shipped simultaneously. We could literally track them in route to the other. It was a pleasing deal to say the least.
This is wrong, IMHO.
Just curious what others think about this established system. And does anyone here do anything differently?
v/r
Why is it accepted that when one is buying an item from the internet classifieds, that the check or money order, must first appear before the seller ships the agreed item?
Both parties stand to lose equally if the other is not legit. Seller can lose the item, and the buyer can lose the cash.
What about a trade? Does the person who initiated the deal wait for the traded item to show up before their item is shipped?
I buy a bunch of stuff on line. Knock on wood, I've never been stiffed yet.
But it gets frustrating sending good money out, just to wait for "the trusted stranger" to produce their goods.
Why can't both parties ship simultaneously? I mean don't both parties in a legit deal stand to lose equally? So why does the buyer accept all of the risk?
An example: I agree to buy some item. I bust *** to the post office to buy a money order, ship it high speed to the seller, then the seller sits on it until it is convenient for them to ship.
I traded a rifle with a fella once, and we both shipped simultaneously. We could literally track them in route to the other. It was a pleasing deal to say the least.
This is wrong, IMHO.
Just curious what others think about this established system. And does anyone here do anything differently?
v/r