Gamesniper19
Well-Known Member
I will agree that carbon does move heat more quickly and under high rates of fire, I too have experience significant mirage with carbon but IMO and IME that is the only draw back....especially shooting something like 6xc that has very little felt recoil.I think a CF barrel is good cutting weight. Thats all. For PRS I wanted a heavy rifle so I got a Criterion MTU profile SS barrel. For a lightweight elk rifle I used a OMR CF prefit. Both are .3 at 100 and sub moa at 1000. But the SS barrel has zero poi **** from a clean cold bore, zero. Best barrel Ive ever seen in that aspect. I wouldnt run a CF in PRS, the mirage gets bad fast coming off the barrel. But in fairness my CF is a 7mag compared to the SS is a 6XC. I agree that thickness creates stiffness, and stiffness probably creates better/wider harmonic nodes but imo CF isnt the be all end all barrel. And I wouldnt put a CF on a target rifle where weight is a plus.
Carbon will outperform steel in every other aspect and under all conditions. This is one of the reasons the air force and other secret programs moved away from Titanium and use carbon nearly exclusively for all high heat, high stress, weight savings and durability programs. Ambient temps have very little to no affect, and its pretty easy to make and store, and use is molding and lots of other applications. Unless its a tank and you dont care if it weighs 60 or 63 tons LOL