ntsqd
Well-Known Member
I was not replying specifically to you, but you are exactly the type of gunsmith that I was suggesting have a look at it. I wouldn't blindly dump the cost of a new action into the existing action, but if there are some simple things that can be done then they should be done. It's all about the return on investment.
I'm currently an industrial - manufacturing tooling designer. I've seen plenty of parts that were out of spec, that when assembled with similar out of spec parts perform as good as or better than an assembly of in spec parts. Doesn't mean that the parts are correct, just that that particular assembly of parts happens to work well. It does not mean, and I've frequently seen, that when this assembly is taken apart and then put back together that it will continue to perform at or above par. All too often that re-assembled assembly performs like you'd expect a bunch of out of spec parts to perform.
That this existing rifle could be one such assembly is within the range of reasonable and until it is looked by someone such as yourself none of us knows anything specific.
I'm currently an industrial - manufacturing tooling designer. I've seen plenty of parts that were out of spec, that when assembled with similar out of spec parts perform as good as or better than an assembly of in spec parts. Doesn't mean that the parts are correct, just that that particular assembly of parts happens to work well. It does not mean, and I've frequently seen, that when this assembly is taken apart and then put back together that it will continue to perform at or above par. All too often that re-assembled assembly performs like you'd expect a bunch of out of spec parts to perform.
That this existing rifle could be one such assembly is within the range of reasonable and until it is looked by someone such as yourself none of us knows anything specific.