I have headspace gauges for most of the rifles I own and what I described was a way to check headspace or head clearance for anyone without headspace gauges. And excessive head clearance is what causes case head seperations.
The only difference between a rimmed, belted or a case that headspaces on it shoulder is the distance from the bolt face to the reference datum headspace point.
And the gunsmith who rebarreled the rifle in this posting screwed up and this rifle with brand new cases was having case head separations. And if the owner of this problem rifle in this posting had used the primer method he would have known he had a headspace problem and excessive head clearance.
I collected the British .303 Enfield rifle and it had removable bolt heads to adjust headspace. And the primer method was a very good method to check the rifles headspace without actual headspace gauges. And when you added your primer measurement to your rim thickness you had your rifles actual headspace
All a headspace gauge will tell you is if the bolt will close or not and you would need headspace gauges in .001 increments to know your approximate headspace within .001 of actual headspace. And you want to tell people that a headspace gauge is more accurate than the primer method.
Below a set of .308 headspace gauges in .001 increments.
The rifle in this posting was not within normal headspace limits and had excessive head clearance. And this excessive head clearance is what caused the cases to stretch and separate.
And it doesn't matter how the rifle headspaces or where the datum point is, it is the head clearance that causes case head separations.
And the reloading dies for a belted cases push the case shoulder back too far when its better to let the belted case headspace on its shoulder.
Headspace is also the distance between your ears and how you use use this space.