jgal72
Well-Known Member
I shoot accubonds as well. Can't say anything bad about them. My 25.06 loves the 110 grain.
I loaded up some some ballistic tips for my cousin a few years ago. They were 120 gr for a 260 remington. He said the buck he shot dropped right where he shot. He told me while cleaning it however the entry was very small but shortly after entering the chest cavity it became nasty and he had to get rid of the opposite side rib cage cause it was nothing but extremely bad blood shot and it was destroyed. He then had me load him some nosler Accubonds and that is what he has been shooting since.
Don't get me wrong the BT are a good bullet. They drop animals in there tracks. The buck I shot this year was a straight through double lung and heart shot. It obliterated the lungs and heart and only punched a quarter size whole out the other side. I shoot 165 gr partitions which I my rifle loves. Anyway the BT is a good bullet for close to mid range for someone who has pretty clear shooting but I wouldn't recommend for brush areas. Just my opinion.
Speaking of shot placement...I learned to hunt whitetail with my dad with the Remmy 700 .243 that my grandad got me for my 12th birthday...Dad taught me where and how to shoot and at what angles...learned to place my shots and that rifle has killed more deer in the 25 years I used it than I can count!!First I will start by saying I have been whitetail hunting in wisconsin for 24years have killed at least 50+ with my gun 20+ with my bow and go out west almost every year and have killed muley's, elk and antelope.
I feel I have a bit of experience hunting especially whitetail. I have killed them with a 30/30 a .270 win 22-250 .338 lapua but most have been shot with my .338 win mag. with some sort of BT type bullet [like Win.ballistic silver tips Hornady SST]
So heres my opinion ANY bullet works for whitetail with proper shot placement.
I prefer some sort of BT bullet.
I don't know what some of the other posters here are using or where they are placing their shots but I have never had the BANG FLOP or DRT that some guys have said.
UNLESS Head shot or I hit them high and took out the spine or shot them in the front shoulder so they can't run anymore. I use this shot quite a bit on public land.Don't want my deer running over to next guy so he can tag it.
I guess my point is I have never dropped any deer in its tracks with the ideal heart lung shot EVER !!
The closest I have ever come to doing that is with my 22-250 45 grain HP varmint bullet at 180 yards it scrambled everything into little chunks but that deer still ran away, and that is not an ideal deer bullet!
I shot a small doe last year at 100 yards with 250 BTHP out of my .338 lapua it was facing me so I shot it straight on bullet scrabbled the lungs and took the top of the heart off and that deer still ran 75 yards.
Like I said before just about anything will work. Think about it Wisconsin had around 600,000 guys in the woods this past year and a lot of deer died I can guarantee you a majority of the guys just went to the store and bought a box of shells. Which were probably one of 2 things either the cheapest or the coolest looking
First I will start by saying I have been whitetail hunting in wisconsin for 24years have killed at least 50+ with my gun 20+ with my bow and go out west almost every year and have killed muley's, elk and antelope.
I feel I have a bit of experience hunting especially whitetail. I have killed them with a 30/30 a .270 win 22-250 .338 lapua but most have been shot with my .338 win mag. with some sort of BT type bullet [like Win.ballistic silver tips Hornady SST]
So heres my opinion ANY bullet works for whitetail with proper shot placement.
I prefer some sort of BT bullet.
I don't know what some of the other posters here are using or where they are placing their shots but I have never had the BANG FLOP or DRT that some guys have said.
UNLESS Head shot or I hit them high and took out the spine or shot them in the front shoulder so they can't run anymore. I use this shot quite a bit on public land.Don't want my deer running over to next guy so he can tag it.
I guess my point is I have never dropped any deer in its tracks with the ideal heart lung shot EVER !!
The closest I have ever come to doing that is with my 22-250 45 grain HP varmint bullet at 180 yards it scrambled everything into little chunks but that deer still ran away, and that is not an ideal deer bullet!
I shot a small doe last year at 100 yards with 250 BTHP out of my .338 lapua it was facing me so I shot it straight on bullet scrabbled the lungs and took the top of the heart off and that deer still ran 75 yards.
Like I said before just about anything will work. Think about it Wisconsin had around 600,000 guys in the woods this past year and a lot of deer died I can guarantee you a majority of the guys just went to the store and bought a box of shells. Which were probably one of 2 things either the cheapest or the coolest looking
I agree that e heart/lung doesn't really produce bang flops. Most of those have run 25-75 yds, but it is always fatal and they don't run far with good shot placement, almost no matter the bullet.
The bang flops I have had are neck shots or putting it right on the upper shoulder, and from talking to most outfitters, that is the place to shoot for bang flops. The theory I have heard and that makes intuitive sense to me is that the high front shoulder shot a) pushes the shoulder blade against to vitals with a lot of energy, and b) turns bone fragments into shrapnel, and c) puts the bullet right into the vitals anyway.
Makes sense to me and fits with my experience this year with a big 225 lb whitetail buck...his legs fell out from under him.
To me the issue is what helps on a less than perfect shot. Ballistic tips and similar seem to have lots of shrapnel and have a better blood trail. Accubonds, unless the hit bone, seem to pencil more frequently and not leave a good blood trail.