Ha ha - yes, he uses 'average rifle weight' for rifles available in that cartridge as well as 'average bullet weight' in his calculations but unfortunately doesn't show the weight of rifle used in the calculations. More unfortunate still, chuckhawks doesn't include 7 PRC or 280 AI in their recoil table so this was the only source I found.I found this interesting…..and very misleading!
I opened the attachment, and found their write-up and data laughable!
Nowhere is the firearm weight mentioned……as this is a key component in felt recoil computation. The included article also stated that recoil at or above 30 ft/ lbs as "massive" recoil……again laughable. My wife's "non braked" hunting rifle is at 39 ft/lbs. felt recoil which she shoots pretty darn good…….and she ain't a linebacker in the NFL!
Perhaps for some of today's shooters…..30 ft/lbs may be considered "massive". Perhaps this "new breed" of shooters would be more at home on a golf course! memtb
However, some merit to his approach and since perceived recoil is quite subjective and affected by rifle fit, shooter etc still useful information for comparative purposes.
As far as recoil being massive, I have recently purchased a 375 H&H and am tempted to add a 416 or 458. However, I have been a dedicated shooter for years and have been working my way up like many of you. I do not think we are the average or novice shooter his comments are geared to…