I disagree with an implication that taking more out of the throat than the muzzle is a 'problem'. An accurate barrel does not ever have the muzzle end more open than the breech end. So to ensure this never happens, barrels are marked after lapping, and the muzzle end is expected to be cut off during finishing.
This can be one of the reasons(aside from reduced copper fouling) that people have been so happy with results after fire lapping. I say 'can be' because it would depend on the barrel.
What I do know is that Tubb's FinalFinish and TMS bullets provide a surface profile matching the best in lapping, and that I've never seen the process hurt a thing. For rough factory barrels, it has always improved my results.
Having seen this so consistently, I now break-in all barrels, including aftermarket, using FF (10 shots, done).
Barrels touted as consistent in bore/groove, end to end, are usually accurate enough because pressure at the breech end is higher than the muzzle end on firing. This has the muzzle expanding less, leaving it the tightest portion of bullet travel.
This can be taken to another level for additional accuracy gains. An 'accurizing' service once offered by Lothar Walther lapped for a particular taper bore. I suspect it was done using extrude honing with bores beginning slightly under cal. Unfortunately, LW makes a lot of business changes into and away from things, while seemingly having no appetite for glory.
You might not know it but LW is the most capable barrel maker in the world. If you can dream it up, they've probably done it and can do it. Any steel, taper bore, gain twist, etc., any rifling methods, treatments, and any measure to any specification.
They'll do it for you at an appropriate price, with lot orders of 100[min](last I inquired). Very interesting company..
If I were rich, they'd make some money from me.