RockyMtnMT
Official LRH Sponsor
I always clean when the rife shows a degradation in performance or once a year after hunting season. As a general rule that is not nearly 100 rounds. I get plenty of shooting with all the diff rifles we work with.
I've went from one extreme to the other and I have seen no difference in the end result in barrel break in procedures, as of now I clean after the first 10 and then I let her eat. My last project has shot Hammers only, 200 rounds in and it's still shooting the same speeds as the first 10 with 0 copper foulingWe have been cleaning before shooting then shooting a few and cleaning to see if there is any copper fouling. If fouling is present then staying with several shots then clean until fouling ends.
With our bullets we rarely see copper fouling so we have pretty much abandoned any formal procedure. I will try and monitor vel farther in the load count to see if I can see any further gain in vel. Seems to be a consensus that the barrel will continue to gain speed until finished.
I have always felt like I am cleaning life out of a barrel when following a full break in procedure. Particularly if there us no copper fouling present.
I use a borescope. When it smooths out and stops holding copper between shots. And follow the brands break in processThis subject gets beat up a lot. I'm not asking opinions on whether or not to break in. I want to know how you all determine when a barrel is successfully broken in. Round count or fouling or something else?
Cleaning regimens are unique to the individual, as is load development.
I have owned a Hawkeye borescope for 8-9 yrs, plus a teslong, I would not advocate to anyone to do what I do.
Spending just a short time cleaning a rifle after a range session would eliminate issues for a lot of us. Unfortunately I usually do not have the enthusiasm to do so.
Powder choice alone will dictate how and when one cleans.
Get your self a borescope, they are pretty cheap now and can tell you volumes about whats going on with your barrel.Can you elaborate/give examples of different powder experiences?
I have heard N570 for example is pretty rough on barrels. My RUM shoots N570 so I clean pretty regular, but do not have a borescope to actually see degradation. If I did, I am sure my OCD would not let me rest until all was back to bare steel. I work the throat area now pretty well because of this.
This has been hashed out here a thousand times, while a borescope is a very useful tool to some most put too much faith in it, and has nothing to do with the OP's questionGet your self a borescope, they are pretty cheap now and can tell you volumes about whats going on with your barrel.
We are getting off the topic of barrel breakin. I think N570 gets a bad misrepresented rap, I would bet most running it are at around 64gr minimum and magnum barrels really never last like smaller cartridge ones. Getting a cleaner burn is paramount.Can you elaborate/give examples of different powder experiences?
I have heard N570 for example is pretty rough on barrels. My RUM shoots N570 so I clean pretty regular, but do not have a borescope to actually see degradation. If I did, I am sure my OCD would not let me rest until all was back to bare steel. I work the throat area now pretty well because of this.
As a smith I build a lot of rifles. Most of the time the client asks me to run a barrel in.This subject gets beat up a lot. I'm not asking opinions on whether or not to break in. I want to know how you all determine when a barrel is successfully broken in. Round count or fouling or something else?
Didn't mean to get off subject, just trying to help him out. IMHO the borescope, once you know what your looking at can really help in cleaning properly, over pressure situations and many other issues that arise.This has been hashed out here a thousand times, while a borescope is a very useful tool to some most put too much faith in it, and has nothing to do with the OP's question