This is a dangerous slippery slope for all if us. "Unfair advantage" etc is commonly perceived with trail cams. Ok, you still have to have skill to hunt a specific animal in order to kill it. Oh wait, stand off long range with laser rangefinder with my super high bc high velocity slip stream bullet, high definition optics, carbon wrapped braked barrel which is now on the table as "unfair advantage". Who makes this determination of what is an "unfair advantage"? This can become the antis call to arms going forward. My question is what empirical evidence do they have of "widespread" abuse with trail cams? Outfitters make their living killing animals with clients. If they do not put clients on animals they are out of business. If the issue is how many they have in use, this can be addressed. I can see some concern with cell cams but some thoughts of no hunting within 3 days of photo. Enforcement in all of these scenarios is impossible. Like a lot of different hunting methods if you don't like it dont use them. Getting tired of someone telling me I cant do something just because you don't like it. Simple analogy "change the channel".