QuietTexan
Well-Known Member
If the warm fuzzies comment was in good faith, I'll apologize. Came off condescending, typically the annealing threads devolve into ****ing matches over which method is better and AMP is a favorite target of trolling by a group of people who refuse to accept tangible evidence that refutes their opinions. I'll eat it, thanks for not being a Richard back
Flame annealing can produce very consistent, quality results. There's no reason not to do it if it's working. It's actually much harder to over-anneal with flame than is commonly thought based on a lot of testing done by several flame-annealing proponents. It might not have the repeatable precision of induction annealing but that doesn't mean that it doesn't have a place as a valid process. Avoiding split necks alone is enough of a reason to do it, and if your shoulder bumps are consistent then that's about as good as you can ask of any by-hand process, including DIY induction annealers.
Flame annealing can produce very consistent, quality results. There's no reason not to do it if it's working. It's actually much harder to over-anneal with flame than is commonly thought based on a lot of testing done by several flame-annealing proponents. It might not have the repeatable precision of induction annealing but that doesn't mean that it doesn't have a place as a valid process. Avoiding split necks alone is enough of a reason to do it, and if your shoulder bumps are consistent then that's about as good as you can ask of any by-hand process, including DIY induction annealers.