I find this a very interesting and useful debate.
I personally use the 4xforfun method, with the addition of the Hornady headspace gauges.
I find them necessary for checking what I am doing and saving time.
First of all, it is useful for a more immediate setting of the FL die on the press in the position giving .0015-.002 bump.
Besides, as everybody knows, it may happen that some cases are harder than the average of the batch and they do not bump the same way.
When it happens, I check this or these cases with the gauge and caliper in order to understand how much I must lower the FL die on the press.
I mark the position of the die on both die and press, so that I can easily change its point of work and recover it after sizing the harder cases with no problem.
A last word concerning the belted calibers: I have been handloading 7 mmRM and 300WM for some buddies since years and sometimes it's a fight.
This is true not only with the oversized chambers of production rifles, but even with custom models.
Apparently - and fortunately - it seems that the world understood that the belt on a bottleneck case is a technical and ballistic nonsense, after the .375H&H.
But here I stop: I don't want to open a further debate on the belted calibers.
Good shooting!
lightbulb