. I asked and was told , just because", concerning the neck which is .2846 saami and the AW print is .2852. The chamber or the .200 line seems to be of concern if using ADG or possibly Peterson brass being of heavier construction sticking " clickers " after several loads, not an issue if you don't hand load. I'm waiting to speak with JGS concerning ordering a reamer. But the reason I'm asking the dumb questions because I'm seeking to be informed. Some don't like the Why questions so they answer with, just because answers.Dumb question perhaps. Isn't a big point of the PRC chamber designs the tight tolerances to add in accuracy? Wouldn't enlarging the chamber defeat this design element?
Those are the freebore diameter specs. The larger diameter allows room for fouling and bullets that are larger than the nominal 0.284 (some are 0.2843-0.2845). There may be other benefits, but those are the two I know if. It doesn't necessarily have anything to do with bullet weight.I'm noticing with the 7 prc custom specs at the neck some are larger than the saami.2846. I noticed the AW at .2852 and up to .2863. What is that helping to achieve? Would this help in utilizing the 195 weight bullets?
The chambers are too tight in the body area and cause extraction problems with multiple fired cases. The only dimensions that affect precision are in the neck and throat areas. The tighter freebore diameters and proper freebore lengths aid in accuracy compared to older outdated SAAMI design. Wildcatters, benchrest shooters, gunsmiths, etc have been running modified and tighter neck and throat dimensions for years to achieve improved results. Too loose isn't the best and neither is too tight so finding the sweet spot is what everyone is trying to do.Dumb question perhaps. Isn't a big point of the PRC chamber designs the tight tolerances to add in accuracy? Wouldn't enlarging the chamber defeat this design element?
Those are the freebore diameter specs. The larger diameter allows room for fouling and bullets that are larger than the nominal 0.284 (some are 0.2843-0.2845). There may be other benefits, but those are the two I know if. It doesn't necessarily have anything to do with bullet weight.
The chambers are too tight in the body area and cause extraction problems with multiple fired cases. The only dimensions that affect precision are in the neck and throat areas. The tighter freebore diameters and proper freebore lengths aid in accuracy compared to older outdated SAAMI design. Wildcatters, benchrest shooters, gunsmiths, etc have been running modified and tighter neck and throat dimensions for years to achieve improved results. Too loose isn't the best and neither is too tight so finding the sweet spot is what everyone is trying to do.
Okay that makes sense to me. Confirms the posit I just made in the cross post. At least when I get clickers I will know how to deal with it.All the deliberation aside, and in my experience of only 2, a SAMMI chamber is going to have clickers on or about the 3rd reload.
With ADG brass, my clickers verged on "stickers".
Sizing dies simply can not size the web down far enough to avoid it. Some have had marginal luck with "small base" dies, while others have broken "small base dies" trying to size the web/head enough to eliminate clickers.
Opening up the .200 datum, by as little as .0015 in my case, is the solution to the clicker problem.
The issue is the brass is too close in size to the SAAMI chamber at the base dimension. When you fire it, it can't really expand because it fits so tight. Then when you size the brass the die doesn't do anything because the brass didn't change dimension much at the base. If you make the die smaller, it can crack the die because you're trying to size down the thick solid case head that was too big to start. So since the brass doesn't get sized and doesn't expand it work hardens at the case head. With the AW reamers, the brass has room to expand outwards some and then the die can size it back down. The brass needs room to grow so then it can be sized down enough so it doesn't prematurely work harden. Others may be able to explain it better or have a better understanding of it, but that's my interpretation of the issues. Hornady should have spec'd the reamer .002 bigger at the 0.200 line on the reamer, or spec'd the brass .002 smaller at the base.Thanks Jud. I am not even thinking accuracy. I am just thinking of the mechanics of reloading and why this would make a difference. It would seem if the worked brass grows to big and can not be appropriately resized for the SAAMI spec chamber that the same thing would happen over a reloading sequence with any chamber. Unless conceptually the case body can only grow so big after multiple resizings?