jnwise
Well-Known Member
Compressing which powder using which manual?I find guys saying they get 3000 FPS or more out of 180 grain bullets hard to believe. I'm compressing powder and getting just over 3000 with 160 grain bullets.
Compressing which powder using which manual?I find guys saying they get 3000 FPS or more out of 180 grain bullets hard to believe. I'm compressing powder and getting just over 3000 with 160 grain bullets.
Don't forget the 325! IMO, they are all great and I feel blessed to have all four!7 WSM should have been the star of the WSM three!
My bad your sure right about that as well, most underrated WSM !Don't forget the 325! IMO, they are all great and I feel blessed to have all four!
I actually think the .325 was the best WSM, and the most under appreciated.7 WSM should have been the star of the WSM three! So many things I don't understand about what is king and what is forgotten. In 2003 my son wanted a 7 in short magnum and tried to order a WSM in 7mm . There was none available in 7 WSM so he ordered the 7 SAUM . It has worked out for him because it's a great cartridge in its own right . Ten years ago a local gun shop put on clearance a case of 7 SAUM Remington ammo because no one had a rifle in this chambering and I bought every round . That with a set of dies and my son is set for the life of the rifle. The 7 WSM is MHO even better and I always thought it would take off like the 270 and 300. Even with the bullet selection and rate of twist in commercial rifles and ammo this chambering should have not only thrived it should have been the WSM's best seller .
I think the 325 is the best of the bunch. 200 grain Accubond and it makes it the hammer if thor.Don't forget the 325! IMO, they are all great and I feel blessed to have all four!
R26 and a 26" barrel in mine and I could get a shade over 3100 with both Berger's and ELD's. I had no sign of excessive pressure but accuracy was at 3035 so I shot it thereI find guys saying they get 3000 FPS or more out of 180 grain bullets hard to believe. I'm compressing powder and getting just over 3000 with 160 grain bullets.
Here is the data I used and I'm getting 3050 with the Federal 160 Trophy Bonded tip and the max load of IMR4350 out of a Model 70 24 inch barrel.Compressing which powder using which manual?
Baggy, I don't think I would trust that load data. For one there's no difference in the load data between the 140 gr and 160 gr bullets. Usually you have to slightly decrease the powder charge when increasing the weight of the projectile. Also there's no way 63 gr of IMR4350 is compressed in that case. That should take nearly 70 gr. Also according to Nosler MAX pressure is at 58.5 grs of IMR4350Here is the data I used and I'm getting 3050 with the Federal 160 Trophy Bonded tip and the max load of IMR4350 out of a Model 70 24 inch barrel.
Here is what the Hornady and Sierra app shows for 160'sBaggy, I don't think I would trust that load data. For one there's no difference in the load data between the 140 gr and 160 gr bullets. Usually you have to slightly decrease the powder charge when increasing the weight of the projectile. Also there's no way 63 gr of IMR4350 is compressed in that case. That should take nearly 70 gr. Also according to Nosler MAX pressure is at 58.5 grs of IMR4350
Well it crunches when I seat the bullet....never noticed it's the same load as the 140 but it's straight from Federals website.Baggy, I don't think I would trust that load data. For one there's no difference in the load data between the 140 gr and 160 gr bullets. Usually you have to slightly decrease the powder charge when increasing the weight of the projectile. Also there's no way 63 gr of IMR4350 is compressed in that case. That should take nearly 70 gr. Also according to Nosler MAX pressure is at 58.5 grs of IMR4350