There's nothing wrong with belted cases, that is a myth created to sell new non-belted magnums.
Barrel life really isn't an issue until you get up to the 7mm Rum. Just don't shoot them hot and keep shooting and you can get enough life out of the STW, Weatherby, Nosler and similar large case 7mm's that most people will never shoot one out. My first STW is 25 years old, approaching 1200rds and I figured it was nearing the end of it's accurate life so I sent it to a friend who's a very competent gunsmith and engineer who bore scoped it and said it was no where near being shot out.
That rifle was my "truck gun" for two decades, was shot regularly even at varmints and predators year round, rarely (maybe annually) cleaned and will still shoot MOA or better with just about anything I feed it.
If you abuse any of the high velocity magnums you'll burn the throat out but if you take reasonably good care of them most can last you for many, many years.
All valid points. The belt thing is personal preference. I know you can headspace as normal and basically ignore it, but to me, it is an outdated design point, there really is no benefit to it and there are more interesting cartridges out there. Honestly, I could have made life easier and gone with the 7RM or STW and be done with it. I'm not saying that they are bad, I just don't want to worry about it. Call it ignorance if you'd like, but with so many good choices out there, one has to find a way to narrow it down.
I'm sure most of the barrel life issues are from guys that like to hot rod them or otherwise abuse them, which leads to reports of low barrel life spreading. It happens. But it is well known that "overbore" cartridges have lower barrel life as they aren't efficient. I wanted to strike a balance, so...different strokes, I guess. A barrel is a big investment for me and I wanted to make it count while achieving my goals.
I'm glad you are getting good life out of your STW. That gives me hope for the LRM. They seem to be similar enough performance wise that a barrel life comparison would be relevant.
+1 I couldn't figure out a way to tackle that much disinformation in 1 post without starting a ******* match. And I didn't want to deal with that crap right now.
Don't forget all the false-narratives about the .280 AI just to self-justify why he went with a magnum. A .280 AI can hunk a 180 Hybrid at 2,900+. And a .30-06 AI can chunk a 185 at 2,900+. Far from slouches, if you ask me. And I own a bunch of magnum caliber rifles, too. But these days the magnum-craze has taken hold, and the interwebz are full of false information to push that new "non-belted magnum is better" narrative, and it becomes very hard to prove to people things they've never experienced first-hand.
That was a hell of a first post...
Man, I didn't mean to get anyone wound up. No p!$$!ng match required and no need to prove anything. I'm not here to perpetuate false narratives and argue...I was simply sharing my perspective, respectfully (or so I thought). One cannot be an expert in all things and when building a rifle, I only know what I have read and can be picky about certain aspects.
I think the 280AI is a great cartridge and doesn't give up a whole lot to any smaller magnums. Again, balancing barrel life and performance was my goal. Others may have different goals. If this were mostly a plinking barrel, the 280AI would have been my pick hands down, but since I have a switch barrel, I didn't need to compromise that much. It may not be a huge difference, but I'll take 195s at 2900 and 180s at 3000-3100 over 180s at 2900 all day.
That being said, once can never have too many rifles and I wouldn't kick any of the aforementioned out of the safe! Good luck and feel better.