Shawn,
Couple of quick questions.
Relative to the lands, where have you found your best accuracy with the 180's (seating depth relative to the lands)?
Also, when looking at my ballistics program, it appears that the velocity of the 180's needs to very close to that of the 168's in order to get similar wind drifts. These velocities are often difficult to achieve, which would appear to make the 180's worthwhile. Yet benchresters and very experienced shooters seem to opt for the 180's. Can you tell me why the 180's are so preferable when the ballistics software doesn't seem to bear it out?
Much appreciated.
Cross