tx338
Well-Known Member
Another vote for 300wsm. If ammo/components were not an issue, I'd look hard at 300 PRC.
Yeaaa! I have been impressed with my old Sako 300 WM. Perhaps I could keep it and still keep my head up. I'm old and so is my WM.There's no doubt about it the 300 WSM is far more proven and will do everything you wanted to do, but since you don't load your own ammo, what would be wrong with a 300 win mag? You can buy ammo for that cheaper, it's been around since Christ was a corporal, and it'll do everything you ever wanted to do, it's just a plain Jane good cartridge, I know you didn't ask for any other cartridge suggestions, but that's my two cents
Since you're not a reloader go with the 300 WSM, the 6.8 Western is nothing more than a 270 WSM with a faster twist to stabilize heavier bullets, to me if Winchester was going to introduce a new cal. it should have been a 6.5 WSM maybe thats just me but that said ammo is normally more available in 30 cal and they'll certainly be around long after we're goneHey Fellas I am new to the site and I am looking for some suggestions. I am 52 years old and have been hunting and shooting all of my life. I live in the Lowcountry of South Carolina and I own and operate a sporting clay range and I have a private rifle range also.
I am thinking about buying a new rifle and I really like the way the 6.8 western looks on paper but not really sure its going to be around long enough to prove itself unless some other companies start making ammo for it (I'm not a reloader). So my other thought was 300WSM. I know one is a 30Cal and the other is a .270 so there is that. I don't want a 270WSM because I can't go past 150gr. Thoughts?
Apparently you don't know that the factory 6.8 is a 8 twist and factory ammo is 165 and 175 grainI would greatly support the 300 WSM, while there are bullets in excess of 150 grains for the .270, they do require a faster twist than you see in factory rifles. The 300 allows you a huge range of bullets and its proving the test of time.