Last edited:
Do you think that 1 in 8 twist should have stabilized the bullet, or am I missing something?It was simply under stabilized for terminal penetration. A well stabilized bullet would have continued in a straight path.
-Mark
Do you think that 1 in 8 twist should have stabilized the bullet, or am I missing something?
I have shot the ceiling tile before using it as target backing and it showed a nice hole.I think you should perform another test. Shoot the ceiling tile without anything in front of it. I be you will only have a hole there. Once the bullet goes through the jug of water it probably loses enough energy/velocity that it becomes unstable.
I am surprised that the water jug didn't blow apart though. Did you have a cap on it or was it open?
Good luck.
Scott
Thanks for the heads up on SF. Is there any reading material available to further my education?One would think the 8 twist would be sufficient.
The Stability Factor (SF) for a bullet to maintain stable flight for general shooting and paper punching is lower the the SF required for terminal penetration.
I think you should perform another test. Shoot the ceiling tile without anything in front of it. I be you will only have a hole there. Once the bullet goes through the jug of water it probably loses enough energy/velocity that it becomes unstable.
I am surprised that the water jug didn't blow apart though. Did you have a cap on it or was it open?
Good luck.
Scott
You could do a net search on the subject... I learned this from conversations with the makers of GS Custom bullets. They list required SF's for their bullets based on application.Thanks for the heads up on SF. Is there any reading material available to further my education?