That's what I did!Or you could also go 280 Sherman
That's what I did!Or you could also go 280 Sherman
100 rounds of factory Nosler ammo and 100 rounds of once fired and new Nosler brass. The K&M neck turner kit came in last. Problem solved. But....painful lesson. Will go Peterson brass when I can get it.I'm sorry you had issues but really appreciate you sharing your story so I know I'm not completely crazy. My 280AI gave me fits with Nosler brass and I found and verified my load with the 175 Berger EH in less than 30 rounds.
a 280 AI almost duplicates a 7 Rem Mag. It's around 100 FPS slower than a 7 Mag. There is a lot of date on a 7 Mag so Find more info on that and just subtract 100 FPS. I am a huge fan of 6.5s and 7mm. I mainly shoot my 260 Remington w/ 140 grain Berger bullets. I've taken many animals up to and over 1000 yards with it. Deer, Elk, Hog, Coyotes. So if my 260 can do it I know for sure a 6.5 Sherman can. A 6.5 Sherman is a step above the new 26 Nosler. They pretty close though. This is a long range hunting sight so I'm taking it your hunting with it. A question is what are you shooting with it and how far?I've never owned an Ackley, but used to have the Sherman. It's still the one that got away, but I wanted something that seemed shinier at the time and couldn't afford to have both.
With the heavy for caliber, high BC 6.5mm options available these days, is there anything the 280AI is capable of that the 6.5 Sherman is not?
I'm looking to assemble a new mountain gun (my Mark V is HEAVY), and I feel a burning need for one of these two rounds.
In what scenarios would one be better than the other?
I was wondering that as wellHelp me understand how the 6.5 Sherman is a step above the 26 Nosler? 26 inch barrels in both? We talking case life, barrel life? I am curious is all!
I have a light-ish weight 280 Sherman (24" carbon barrel- weighs about 8.5 pounds scoped and ready to hunt), and with a small brake, it recoils lighter than my .270 Win or .308 Win without a brake.As far as performance, I would have to give the edge to the Sherman. But, I would also consider: What about barrel life between the two? It seems to me the Sherman would be a barrel burner and the 280AI has a longer barrel life (assuming all things equal in not overheating barrels, etc). 280AI recoils like a 270 win and if the Sherman is similar to a 26 Nosler, that was one of the hardest kicking rifles I ever owned. When trying to decide between two calibers, I think these are also relevant questions (as well as the above stated info about brass cost, fire forming brass, availability of quality dies, and factory ammo options).
when comparing grain for grain bullets the Sherman will have a higher velocity. Higher velocity means more kinetic energy.I was wondering that as well
in your statement/question you seam to be talking about durability and not performance.I was wondering that as well
LOL - I recently picked up my Mark V - and solid as can be - but t is heavy - or I am getting much older - or both.I've never owned an Ackley, but used to have the Sherman. It's still the one that got away, but I wanted something that seemed shinier at the time and couldn't afford to have both.
With the heavy for caliber, high BC 6.5mm options available these days, is there anything the 280AI is capable of that the 6.5 Sherman is not?
I'm looking to assemble a new mountain gun (my Mark V is HEAVY), and I feel a burning need for one of these two rounds.
In what scenarios would one be better than the other?
LoL!!! Yeah I know what you mean. For some reason my rifle seams much heavier than it did a few years ago.LOL - I recently picked up my Mark V - and solid as can be - but t is heavy - or I am getting much older - or both.