4bycamper
Well-Known Member
Hey Tank, I found an old thread from 2008. 338/375 Ruger. Wouldn't this be the same as a 338 Campfire Improved? Poster is advised to do a Google search.
.
.
There is a slight difference in the diameter of the base in those two cartridges.
But the base diameters are the same with the 375 Ruger and the 7mm Mag so I can at least see some indication as to why in your example but am stumped on the example I posted.
Guys, the 375 ruger case, necked to 7 or 338 or whatever would work in any action that is set up for the standard magnum chamberings. A 7mm rem mag, 300 win mag ect share the same bolt face dia. with the 375 ruger case .532"
What may need to change is the Magazine box and follower. Typically the wsm and ultras as well as the 375 case would need a window style mag box in bdl configuration. Most times the action is fitted for a wyatts ex. window box.
I've built plenty of ultra mags on old rem 700s that were 7mm rem mags in factory format, they work fine, ocasionally a feed rail may need work but not always.
So look at the diagram of the cartridge, the base is a .532 and tapers to the belt width of .515 at the shoulder. This tells me there would be plenty of volume to stuff some powder in it and let her rip. From your experience, what kind of velocities do you surmise this kind of combination would develop? I think it would be another big 338, I just don't know how big!
Tank
Tank, the case capicity of the 375 Ruger is not as large as the RUM or Lapua Cases. It will fall about halfway between a 338WM and a RUM. The RUM has a slightly larger diameter and is about .3" longer at the shoulder. My guess would be that the 338-375 Ruger would be about 100 fps slower than the EDGE shooting the 300 SMK. Just a guess. Still not a bad cartridge. I really like it's potential for 30 cal and 7mm bullets. I think using RL17 with those cartridges would bring them very close to RUM performance using a good bit less powder and a shorter COAL.
My guess would be that the 338-375 Ruger would be about 100 fps slower than the EDGE shooting the 300 SMK. Just a guess.I'm gonna back opff this estimate a little. I'll say a 100 fps slower than the 338 RUM with the 300 SMK
338-375 Ruger, 2650
338 RUM, 2750
Edge, 2850
I still think it will come real close to the RUMs in the 7mm and 300 using RL17 and and the larger medium weight bullets like the 160's and 180's. Well within 100 fps with maybe 80 gr of powder.
With that it brings me back to the 338 Norma. That would be a fun one to neck down for a 7mm also. The only draw back is having to turn your bolt face to a .588" That is where the Ruger might be a viable option.
Tank