I get what your saying and appreciate seeing another shooters side.... my goal is a mile, that goal can be reached at this velocities..... I'm not sure I want the throat erosion and barrel burning from running with the highest possible charge weight..... usually you'll find better longevity & consistency not chasing un necessary velocitiesYep, I'd definitely keep going up until you see the first sign of pressure.
At 95grs, it's just under full capacity....I do not have a bunch of experience with the 338 lapua but from what I remember the ones I messed with always shot best on the high end fill her up
ES and SD on 94.1 Grains is very similar and only 20 ft./s difference your powder will go farther the life of your barrel will go far there as well.I run 94 Grains of retumbo with a 250 elite hunter in my 338 Lapua and getting 2948 ft./sHey guys been a while... got some data I'd like to throw at you..... yes I know the round count is small but I'm on a budget, still good data...still it's only 3 rounds per load, I get it
Gr.wght.....avg.vel...SD....ES
94.1.....2833....6....12
94.4.....2848.....8.....16
94.7......2852.....11.....22
95.0......2856......6......11
95.3......2859......11.....20
My opinion is 95 is what I'm looking for, the average velocity is real close to above&below velocities and SD & ES looks real good.. all opinions are welcome!
I thought the very same, however I'm at the bottom of my velocity needed at 2850fps for 1,760yardsES and SD on 94.1 Grains is very similar and only 20 ft./s difference your powder will go farther the life of your barrel will go far there as well.I run 94 Grains of retumbo with a 250 elite hunter in my 338 Lapua and getting 2948 ft./s
Shoot them as a ladder at 600 yds and maybe then you will get your answer.Hey guys been a while... got some data I'd like to throw at you..... yes I know the round count is small but I'm on a budget, still good data...still it's only 3 rounds per load, I get it
Gr.wght.....avg.vel...SD....ES
94.1.....2833....6....12
94.4.....2848.....8.....16
94.7......2852.....11.....22
95.0......2856......6......11
95.3......2859......11.....20
My opinion is 95 is what I'm looking for, the average velocity is real close to above&below velocities and SD & ES looks real good.. all opinions are welcome!
What do you think I would see that the actual velocities didn't show or imply? Tight SD's will always look good at 600 .... even loose velocities will look good at 600 with a lapua, .... not being a smart *** so please don't take this out of context, thank you for the replyShoot them as a ladder at 600 yds and maybe then you will get your answer.
What do you think I would see that the actual velocities didn't show or imply? Tight SD's will always look good at 600 .... even loose velocities will look good at 600 with a lapua, .... not being a smart *** so please don't take this out of context, thank you for the reply
Can you elaborate on that, I'm thinking numerical data is actually pretty revealing... am I wrong? Please explain your statement, thank youYou will see what the numbers don't actually tell you.
I'm anxious to see how they group too.... do you think a harmonic node will also reflect in the velocities of certain loads. I mean the idea is to find a relaxed state in the barrel harmonics, wouldn't that also be relative to velocities? I'm curious your thoughts on thisI know ES/SD gets more critical the further you get out especially once you start breaking that 1500 yd mark and get closer to 2000. What I have found is that it's not just the ability of the load to produce consistent velocities but for the load to also be in time with the barrel, I have yet to figure out any other way to do that other than shots on paper. Let me know if you have figured out a way.
I am interested to see how they group.