300WSM or 300 mag ?

I have a serengeti chambered 30-06 that I would put up against a 308 any day, And also I should have made myself clear that
when I said perform better I meant at high to over max pressures. The bottle neck max out way before the streamline one does, I have not shot a standard spec case in 30 years.
 
.308 diameter holes are hard to beat !! The .300WM will serve you well, you should at least be able to find casings, brass, fuel and primers hopefully for it...who knows with the other new-bees on the block in the middle of nowhere should an issue arrive..
 
300 WSM is a better design in my opinion for a case, but they kind of screwed up the throat in the design. That is why all the factory ammo is 150-180 gr. Companies adapted to the screwed up throat design. Of course, when you throat for the ideal 200-215gr bullet, then it doesn't fit in the ~3" mags. It really needs a 3.2"-3.3" mag…what action is that? 270 WSM fits the mag, but still biased towards lighter bullets. Brass is also a problem. You have only Norma brass available. The others are so poorly made that they don't belong in this conversation.

300 WM is ok. Seems like throats and mags are in general alignment. Twists are often 10—12 twist, but really, 10-9 twist is a better range. Good brass is available. I haven't studied this one enough to know all the belt struggles that folks talk about, but I would guess those are more related to die & chamber design. That said, why put a belt on the case?? On a positive note, the belt helps positive ignition with short sized brass. I would also expect short sized brass to blow forward, held by the belt, instead of creating a thin brass wall near the 0.2" line, but I don't have experience here.

300 PRC….kind of the best of all. Better SAAMI throats. Generally barrels are 9 twist. Lapua and Peterson brass available. The mags are generally 3.6"…although CIP length might be better for VLD'S. No personal experience here, but folks complain about the die, chamber, brass fit at the base causing clickers

300 Sherman in a 3.43" mag. @elkaholic does a lot to make simple Wildcats where brass, reamer and dies all work together harmoniously. FL Sizing is barely moving brass! Peterson, Starline both make brass. The only reason not to do this is if buying factory ammo is a require!

30 Sherman Mag….basically an improved PRC.
 
I like the 300 WSM, for two reasons. It shoots tighter groups than my 300 WM and because of the shorter action it is about a pound lighter. It also chambers better, probably because of the shorter action. Brass is easily obtainable, bullet choice is fairly broad, and..... Ok, there are more than two reasons.
 
I have a 300 WSM sako finnlight (for sale here in the clasifieds) that shoots factory 200 grain ELD-X from a 24" barrel @2840. Just for comparison, the same hornady 200 gran ELD-X factory load does 2900fps from a 26" 300 WBY. I was very pleased by the 300 WSM performance from a more compact package…
 
.300 win mag was my personal choice…haven't been sorry.

But I'm not sure there's a wrong answer to the .30 caliber magnum question. It's my favourite "ballistic niche"…apart from large thick skinned dangerous game and varminting there just isn't much you can't do and do well with a fast .30 of some kind, I think they're the most versatile cartridges on earth.

.300 win mag is the most ubiquitous of the .30 mags and that's the sole reason for my choice.
 
If you were going to get one for Elk hunting which would you get. Don't plan on shooting more than 600 yards. I had a 300WSM and shot an Elk at 535 yards ran 20 yards. Sold it to help pay for a 6.5x284 for my sheep hunt. Have never had a 300 mag. I know my 6.5 would get it done at 600 but would like something with a little more for that shot if I don't make the perfect shot and end up in the shoulder.
I shoot 300wm for bear/elk. Both are loaded with 200gr eldx using imr4350. It's a great combo.

Also shoot 264wm with 140gr accubonds!
 
In all fairness a 300WM holds 10+ more grains of powder than the 300WSM.
And I have also found all things being equal, that a longer more streamlined case will perform better
than one that bottlenecks abruptly.

Dean
Perhaps that's what you observed but the bench rest guys all say that a short fat volume of powder is more efficient than the long skinny type. I have noticed you can have shorter barreled guns in short magnums as the long cases take longer to burn the powder thus the long barrels.
So if you are walking around with that gun you might like the short magnum. If you set up in a location you can get the long gun out.🤠
 
Top