Much like there was a time when we desired LRF's, chronographs and finally got them I feel the same way about pressure testing. Sooner or later we'll be able to do reliable pressure testing and the equipment will become reasonably priced.
And I suspect that just like when people started using good LRF's they found out how many of those 400 yard shots were really 250 yds and with the clocks how many loads that were supposed to be going 3000 were really going 2800 or so.
Point being, when we finally get the pressure testing equipment I bet we'll be suprised at how many of our loads are really stomping on it.... Until then we only have our selves to please.
I suspect there's a lot of 70K+ loads being used but I could be wrong, have been so before and will be again in the future.
Look for good pressure tested data and loads when we can, and follow the speed. If you/I/we are running some number quite a bit higher than others then there's a reason for it. That or we got a poor speed reading and we know that happens as well.
Just a thunk
And I suspect that just like when people started using good LRF's they found out how many of those 400 yard shots were really 250 yds and with the clocks how many loads that were supposed to be going 3000 were really going 2800 or so.
Point being, when we finally get the pressure testing equipment I bet we'll be suprised at how many of our loads are really stomping on it.... Until then we only have our selves to please.
I suspect there's a lot of 70K+ loads being used but I could be wrong, have been so before and will be again in the future.
Look for good pressure tested data and loads when we can, and follow the speed. If you/I/we are running some number quite a bit higher than others then there's a reason for it. That or we got a poor speed reading and we know that happens as well.
Just a thunk