I'll pass.
That's what you should have done to begin with.
Last edited:
I'll pass.
I think I'm of the same mind. When the 'old' .270 Win starts to show it is time for a new barrel, why not 'upgrade' to the AI and gain some velocity without having to change the magazine or bolt face? Plus, a different twist rate will allow the use of the higher BC bullets available now. Other than having to get some new dies, I'm not seeing the down side here. Especially when the gun can still safely fire 'regular' .270 Win ammo.When my .270 Win Rem 700 BDL '72 model needs a new barrel I'm seriously thinking about putting 270AI on the old girl but with a different twist for the heavier bullets.
First off, good luck on the bear hunt. That is great you get out to do that with your son. Memories to live off in times to come.That's me I'm the one who built the Ruger's in .270 AI. Dennis Olson built the rifles for us at the beginning of the year. <SNIPPED STUFF> We've (my son and I) have been playing with the 35 Whelens and the .358 Winchesters getting ready for our annual bear hunt in Maine; leaving this coming Saturday for a six-day hunt.
I think I'm of the same mind. When the 'old' .270 Win starts to show it is time for a new barrel, why not 'upgrade' to the AI and gain some velocity without having to change the magazine or bolt face? Plus, a different twist rate will allow the use of the higher BC bullets available now. Other than having to get some new dies, I'm not seeing the down side here. Especially when the gun can still safely fire 'regular' .270 Win ammo.
As to those that seemingly just dropped by to 'troll', I guess I could go .280 AI. I could get a whole new gun and go .270 WSM or .270 Weatherby. But...why? I already have a gun I like. I have reloading components for the caliber already. And just as some are 'gaga' over 6.5 CM stuff, I'm a fan of .270 Win stuff. It just appeals to me. But I want the velocity it was originally introduced with, not the watered down version we get sold today. The .270 AI gives me that.
In the end, I could do a lot of things and some of them might even be more 'clinically logical' than a .270AI. But I'm curious about the round and tapped into this thread to hear from people that are using it to find out what they like, dislike, and have learned about the round. What velocity are they getting with 130 grain, 150 grain, 160 grain (Nosler Partition!), and 170 grain bullets (Berger). Maybe there are other bullets I wasn't even aware of (like the Matrix) that people like.
If there is something "wrong" with doing a .270AI, I'd like to hear that, too. Why does it make 'no sense'? I'm not seeing it yet. But we'll see as this thread progresses.
First off, good luck on the bear hunt. That is great you get out to do that with your son. Memories to live off in times to come.
Secondly, I'm looking at converting my Ruger 77 'tang' model at some point, so looking forward to hearing more details when you are done bagging 'Yogi' and get your dies in and have more time to fool around with your newest creation.
@John Polk, I thought you were going to move on...yet you stay and provide nothing constructive. This site isn't like others. The administrators will remove trolls. We get it. You see no point in the .270AI. Thanks for that input. Please, go start your own thread for whatever it is that DOES interest you. Thanks!
While I have several 270's, currently, I do not own the AI version, but many years ago, I had a 270 Gibbs. I guess you would call that a super AI, for it had the 40degree shoulder pushed forward leaving a .250" length neck. At the time, we used a 1/10 twist for the bullets of the day, 130-150gr, so I never had the current availability of the heavier and higher BC designs. In my 24" tube and with powders back then, I found I could increase 130gr velocity 200-250fps faster than the standard 270, which allowed me to have 270WbyMag velocity without the issues of that case design nor mag action. Accuracy was excellent, and while today the 270WSM is a simpler solution, one day when the wildcatting bug bites again, I would love to play with another Gibbs or AI in an 1/8 twist in a 26-28" tube. YMMV
Has anyone here used their 270 AI on elk yet? I originally was going to build one and in reality still could. I have the barrels, actions, and brass just sitting around. All I'd need really is to set the barrels back and purchase the dies. The dies are expensive but heck, I already have everything lol.
Has anyone here used their 270 AI on elk yet? I originally was going to build one and in reality still could. I have the barrels, actions, and brass just sitting around. All I'd need really is to set the barrels back and purchase the dies. The dies are expensive but heck, I already have everything lol.
Thanks for the offer, a bit rich my beer budget.About $400+ for a set of custom dies and a hydra form die from Hornady.
If I read this correctly, you are saying the guys at Rokslide are shooting 165 and 170 grain bullets from the 1-10 twist?I just remembered both of my barrels are standard 1-10 twist. But the guys over at Rokslide shot the 165's and 170's and have done okay. Maybe if I find some AI dies for cheap I'll pull the trigger, so to speak