BJD,
The group in #69 is a winner!
Ed
The group in #69 is a winner!
Ed
Berger is not going to have the 270 170s by hunting season this year, in my opinion. I did get ahold of Marshal at Matrix and he sold me two boxes of his 175s. He may have a few left if you contact him.
Ill see how these do and make a choice for my November Mule Deer Hunt.
If it is any help…The Matrix 175s shot at an average 3054fps (20 round ES 28fps) with 71grs of H1000 out of my 270 Wby, 28" Benchmark 1-9 barrel...
Feenix- have you tried any of the 175s?
New range development:
I went back to the Nosler LRAB in 150gr. And i used ERetumbo and US869 instead of 7828, and h4831 and h1000.
The results were stunning.
3464 with Retumbo
3567 with Us869
The load ladder shot a 3/4 group with different powders and a 1 gr variance in charge.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm...........
I wonder if the Cutting Edge 140s would break 3600. Do i need to, no. But could I?
New range development:
I went back to the Nosler LRAB in 150gr. And i used ERetumbo and US869 instead of 7828, and h4831 and h1000.
The results were stunning.
3464 with Retumbo
3567 with Us869
The load ladder shot a 3/4 group with different powders and a 1 gr variance in charge.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm...........
I wonder if the Cutting Edge 140s would break 3600. Do i need to, no. But could I?
New range development:
I went back to the Nosler LRAB in 150gr. And i used ERetumbo and US869 instead of 7828, and h4831 and h1000.
The results were stunning.
3464 with Retumbo
3567 with Us869
The load ladder shot a 3/4 group with different powders and a 1 gr variance in charge.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm...........
I wonder if the Cutting Edge 140s would break 3600. Do i need to, no. But could I?
Big Jake Duke,
You are operating in the same stratosphere as the 270 Allen Magnum, most probable with considerably less power, which is a good thing.
I'm thinking ES in your cartridge will be way less than the AM with US 869, would be interesting to know for sure.
With the 130 to 150 weight range I found 7828ssc a great option to 869. 7828ssc was the only stick powder that wouldn't bridge in the AM case. For 165 and above ssc seemed a bit too fast.
Berger 170s "appear" to be available, or at least nearly so.
I have a build in the thinking stage. Depending on the bolt face on the action selected the 270-300 will be a strong consideration. If I use the action that was used on the AM the 270-300 will be the choice. If I use a standard size bolt face it will be a 270 Sherman. It all depends on how some trading ends up.
You're doing good work!
Where have you found out that the Berger 170s may be available?
Thanks