Is this "new" something other than the existing BD2? The BD2 from last year works well in my 8 twist 7 AM, but that's launching at nigh 3,700 fps...There is a good possibility that the new 150 will still be stabilized by an 8 twist
Is this "new" something other than the existing BD2? The BD2 from last year works well in my 8 twist 7 AM, but that's launching at nigh 3,700 fps...There is a good possibility that the new 150 will still be stabilized by an 8 twist
Could you post a picture of the 140 .277? Not seeing one on your store. ThanksThere is a good possibility that the new 150 will still be stabilized by an 8 twist
Not on their site, but this is what they look like. Seated .020" off in a .270 Sherman. Sharpie shows bearing surface in the case neck.Could you post a picture of the 140 .277? Not seeing one on your store. Thanks
Please do. I'm having a barrel throated to seat the 140s longer right now. Maybe, I should wait....I really like the way the rounds look in your photo. You have excellent accuracy to close to 1000 yds. I like the longer neck as well. You got me thinking about making one. I've got a long action ARC action I could use. Whose reamer did you use and could you send me the throat dimensions? We were discussing yesterday designing a very high BC 150 gr copper Bulldozer hunting/target bullet that will run in a 1:7 twist barrel.
The 140 needs an 8 twist. We will try and make the 150 stabilize in a 1:7.5, but if you are building a 1:7 gun, by all means use that twist. We are trying to make the new 150 stable in factory rifles with 1:7.5 barrels. I don't think your round will be any stubbier since the length of the 150 we anticipate to be <0.085" longer than the 140. Have to see how the computer modeling turns out.Please do. I'm having a barrel throated to seat the 140s longer right now. Limited to 2.950 COAL though, but if the 150 is going to stabilize in 1:7 just like the 140 needs, I'm guessing it'll be a little stubbier?
I thought the 140 was 7 twist. Guess not. .085 longer, I'm gonna wait and see what you come up with so I don't throat this too short these bullets are LONG and eat a lot of case in saami chambers. I did just buy a bunch of 140s though.The 140 needs an 8 twist. We will try and make the 150 stabilize in a 1:7.5, but if you are building a 1:7 gun, by all means use that twist. We are trying to make the new 150 stable in factory rifles with 1:7.5 barrels. I don't think your round will be any stubbier since the length of the 150 we anticipate to be <0.085" longer than the 140. Have to see how the computer modeling turns out.
I agree. The 1:7twist will definitely work for the new bullet.Really interested to hear about this bullet. Looking at building something .277 on a 7 twist and this bullet might be the ticket.
despite the SAAMI throat you still will be ahead of the competition because the bullet is very efficient (highest BC/weight).I thought the 140 was 7 twist. Guess not. .085 longer, I'm gonna wait and see what you come up with so I don't throat this too short these bullets are LONG and eat a lot of case in saami chambers. I did just buy a bunch of 140s though.
Ya, I always send a dummy round for any barrel I'm having made.Whoever is chambering your barrel compare their reamer drawing to SAAMI. most gunsmiths I've encountered chamber for short actions not medium or long so they use a short throat.
Ya, but if you're spending money on custom, it might as well be custom.despite the SAAMI throat you still will be ahead of the competition because the bullet is very efficient (highest BC/weight).