Mach 1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2018
- Messages
- 770
IF Hornday had made the 260 they would have done 3 things.
Made ammo with more consistent quality brass
Made ACCURATE Ammo, affordable like the CM, and up to it's spec/potential
Had it set from inception with 8 twist
That might have given the 260 a much better success at launch.
On the 9 twist, I had a Sako 75 sporter, grey wolf, shot first 2 in same hole at 200 yds, 3rd opened to 1-1.25" - over and over for 3-shot groups. Yes, in 260. Using both Federal 7/08 and Federal 308 brass necked down, 130 - Either Accubonds or Bergers, over H4350. That load with Bergers shot 1/2" at 200 in a Borden action rifle with Bartlein #3 8 twist. Yes, 260s will shoot great, but I used them enough to say, there is a tighter range of what makes one run at it's potential. Again the CM and 47 will, in my experience, be easier to find accuracy. As to any speed difference, no animal will know that in the field, and any drop/drift can be handled by a few clicks.
Not the first time, nor perhaps the last that Rem will mess up what might be a good thing.
hornady makes crap brass and their bullets are bottom of the pile as well. the brass dosent last, it's to soft. peterson lapua norma all make substantially better brass. have you ever weighed hornady bullets? they are all over the place. their eld line is a step in the right direction but still falls short of matchkings or berger's. hornady is all about reinventing the wheel. which is fine. musicians do it all the time.
as far as remington has hornady, you can't compare what is done now with what was done when the 260 came out. there are so many more people that shoot med to long ranges these days than in the past it's not comparable. let alone the bullet selection we have now a days is amazing. it didnt used to be this way. i can remember when shooting a spiral point boat tail bullet was the best to be had.