260 Rem Vs. 6.5-06

What is a better hunting caliber the 260 Rem or the 6.5-06?


  • Total voters
    948
The 6.5-284 has been an unattractive caliber to me because of big powder charges and short barrel life (reportedly ~ 1200 rounds or a bit more) and I fear the 6.5-06 might suffer the same thing. That's why for me if it was a 6.5 it would be either a 260/260AI or a larger caliber such as 7mm08/284 win/280/280AI with straight 284 Win being my favorite...

Read about the straight 284 over at 6mmbr.com they are very impressed by it..

Barrel life with the 6.5/284 is usually around 800 to 1000 rounds. The case design like most all rounds that came out of the .284 Winchester is poor. Where as the 6.5-06 has a much longer neck (about .320" verses the .270" on the .284 case if everything is perfect). The one good thing the 6.5/284 has going for it is that you can buy preformed brass that is the correct neck length. Otherwise you'd be looking at a .240" neck length; which is really bad. The 6.5-06 has been done with the standard 30-06 shoulder angle as well as 30 degrees and 40 degrees (probably others). I would think that an improved 6.5-06 case with a 30 degree shoulder would be good for well over 2000 rounds. The Ackley version will easilly do that, but presents another issue to deal with (not a big one if you can reload well). There is another 6.5 improved round that is built off the 7x57 case like the .257AI and the 6mm Remington. It will drive a 140 grain bullet too 2950 fps without a lot of trouble
gary
 
Gary.....You are correct in the 6.5-06 with the sharper shoulder. My 6.5 Sherman has now fired around 1200 rounds and it holds around 5% more powder than the 6.5-06 A.I. I haven't noticed ANY decrease in accuracy at this point. The 40 degree shoulder directs the flame point INSIDE the confines of the neck rather than into the throat like a 6.5/284. I have a .300" neck on my Sherman. I firmly believe that the dynamic that takes place is very similar to directing the flame point of a cutting torch. If you have ever done any cutting with a torch, you will know what I mean. I can exceed 3200' with the 140's with a 26" barrel..........Rich
 
Hi,
I meant the 260 Ackley Improved, it is much more efficient than the 6.5-06 so will give you a longer barrel life, with 6.5/284 ballistics. The bullet of choice being the 140 Berger VLD
If yo are looking at .284s just go to a 7mm mag, if you do some checking you will see that you need to go to a little heavier bullet to get the ballistics optimal. For reference you can go to the Berger Bullet website, see how high the ballistic coefficient is for the 6.5 140gr? Then look at the 7 mm 168gr BC
Both are extremely high,consequently I have built my rifles around these bullets to reach out to the longer ranges.
Whatever you do enjoy.
 
Gary.....You are correct in the 6.5-06 with the sharper shoulder. My 6.5 Sherman has now fired around 1200 rounds and it holds around 5% more powder than the 6.5-06 A.I. I haven't noticed ANY decrease in accuracy at this point. The 40 degree shoulder directs the flame point INSIDE the confines of the neck rather than into the throat like a 6.5/284. I have a .300" neck on my Sherman. I firmly believe that the dynamic that takes place is very similar to directing the flame point of a cutting torch. If you have ever done any cutting with a torch, you will know what I mean. I can exceed 3200' with the 140's with a 26" barrel..........Rich

The longer neck not only helps to hide the turbulance point from the throat (along with the sharper shoulder angle), but it also seems to guide the bullet better as it leaves the case. Now I figure some folks must have a lot of money, and no place to direct it (send me some), so they keep buying barrels. They then become enslaved to the folks keeping them afloat. But everytime you buy a new barrel blank, you enter into a new crap shoot. Will it be as good as the old one that wasn't quite as good as the first one? Or who knows maybe even better! It's not like you can over to Ed's Barrel Depot and take one for a test drive!
gary
 
Hi,
I meant the 260 Ackley Improved, it is much more efficient than the 6.5-06 so will give you a longer barrel life, with 6.5/284 ballistics. The bullet of choice being the 140 Berger VLD
If yo are looking at .284s just go to a 7mm mag, if you do some checking you will see that you need to go to a little heavier bullet to get the ballistics optimal. For reference you can go to the Berger Bullet website, see how high the ballistic coefficient is for the 6.5 140gr? Then look at the 7 mm 168gr BC
Both are extremely high,consequently I have built my rifles around these bullets to reach out to the longer ranges.
Whatever you do enjoy.

CAD the case drawing up on the .260, and the .260AI. There's little to be gained as the .308 case is already considered an improved cartridge design. Add that plus the short neck, and you have became a gunsmith's friend! Before even considering a .260AI, I'd look at a 6.5x55 AI or a 6.5x57AI. You take the same case design that the .257AI uses and neck it up to 6.5mm, and your talking about 200+fps with a longer barrel life
gary
 
Hi Gary,
With the 260 AI I'm getting 3100 FPS with the 140 Berger. Are you thinking I could improve 2oo FPS? With a 6.5-57?
It could be that the AI is a little more efficient vs the std 260, hence the improvement. I also still have some room for more powder, but it doesnt yield much improvement.
 
Hi Gary,
With the 260 AI I'm getting 3100 FPS with the 140 Berger. Are you thinking I could improve 2oo FPS? With a 6.5-57?
It could be that the AI is a little more efficient vs the std 260, hence the improvement. I also still have some room for more powder, but it doesnt yield much improvement.

Terry......what is your barrel length?...Rich
 
Hi Gary,
With the 260 AI I'm getting 3100 FPS with the 140 Berger. Are you thinking I could improve 2oo FPS? With a 6.5-57?
It could be that the AI is a little more efficient vs the std 260, hence the improvement. I also still have some room for more powder, but it doesnt yield much improvement.

what I'm saying is that it's common knowledge that the 6.5AI will do an honest 3100+ fps without getting into the 75K psi range. The .260 is about maxed out with a 140 grain bullet at 2750 fps, and there's no way your going to gain nearly 400 fps by blowing the shoulder out to 40 degrees and opening up the body about .005" without going to 75Kpsi. There's not a lot of body taper in the .260 anyway (.015"), so all the powder gains will be in the shoulder. yet with the longer 6.5 bullets you'll loose that when you push the bullet back into the shoulder due to the short neck. But looking at the 57mm Mauser case, it has .037" taper built into it. Then taking the .010" Ackley standard taper you'll gain about .025" in volume by blowing the case out, plus what you gain from blowing the shoulder out from 18 degrees to 40 degrees with a neck that will come out at roughly .260" in length after fire forming (still too short). After fire forming the .260AI (he never did that round by the way) you'll see a neck length of about .24", which is way too short unless you start out with 6.5x55 brass and cut it long.

be safe
gary
 
I started reading this and had to gather my thoughts on the two cartridges. I have both,hunted with both and now have a 6.5 Creedmoor in a Ruger 77. To say I am pleased with it would be an understatement. It's a shooter! That may sling some mud, but I'not known for keeping all my wheels on the same road day after day.

Yes,I'm a new guy here,but in the rest of the world,I'm old. Just found the site and I like it so far.
We'll chat so more......




If you can't skin,you can hold a leg....Abe Lincoln
 
Last edited:
what I'm saying is that it's common knowledge that the 6.5AI will do an honest 3100+ fps without getting into the 75K psi range. The .260 is about maxed out with a 140 grain bullet at 2750 fps, and there's no way your going to gain nearly 400 fps by blowing the shoulder out to 40 degrees and opening up the body about .005" without going to 75Kpsi. There's not a lot of body taper in the .260 anyway (.015"), so all the powder gains will be in the shoulder. yet with the longer 6.5 bullets you'll loose that when you push the bullet back into the shoulder due to the short neck. But looking at the 57mm Mauser case, it has .037" taper built into it. Then taking the .010" Ackley standard taper you'll gain about .025" in volume by blowing the case out, plus what you gain from blowing the shoulder out from 18 degrees to 40 degrees with a neck that will come out at roughly .260" in length after fire forming (still too short). After fire forming the .260AI (he never did that round by the way) you'll see a neck length of about .24", which is way too short unless you start out with 6.5x55 brass and cut it long.

be safe
gary

That is EXACTLY what happens with the 6.5 Gibbs case and why I designed the 6.5 Sherman which holds a little more than the Gibbs and has a MUCH better neck. This also happens with most of the A.I. cases based on the 'o6. That is why I always used .270 cases for my 6.5-06 A.I. and why I even use the 6.5x65 RWS or the .280 A.I. Nosler brass for my Sherman case........Rich
 
Last edited:
That is EXACTLY what happens with the 6.5 Gibbs case and why I designed the 6.5 Sherman which holds a little more than the Gibbs and has a MUCH better neck. This also happens with most of the A.I. cases based on the 'o6. That is why I always used .270 cases for my 6.5-06 A.I. and why I even use the 6.5x65 RWS or the .280 A.I. Nosler brass for my Sherman case........Rich

I used to be one of those guys that thought that the bigger the case behind the bullet the better. Then I moved back a few steps as all I was doing was blowing powder out the end of the barrel. But just didn't know exactly what was going on. While this was going on I watched buddies I shot with make a barrel maker rich! Then I read some stuff in P.S., and it got my wheels cranking again. I started to make CAD drawings of cases and figured the T.P. verses the throat. So after that on a whim I ran some thru a CAD program at work that allows you to factor in gas pressure and heat. That's where I figured that the T.P. had to be in the half of the neck closest to the shoulder if not the first third of the neck. Now then we get into the minds of Ferris and Lou Palmasono about case capacity and accuracey. I still don't grasp half of his thoughts. I'd like to have another eight hours of converstion with him, as I have questions.

But I have learned some things:
*too much powder to burn is as bad as not enough
*Keep the bullet away from the shoulders, and try to have the gas pressure comming off the shoulders to hit the bottom of the bullet even with the shoulders, or even slightly out from the shoulder. Gives a better seal in the case
*Long necks like beer bottles are better! They tend to guid the bullet into the throat better, creating better groups.
*too big a flash hole is as bad as no flash hole!
*sort cases by capacity in the end. The weight of a 1" cube of brass will vary a lot more than most of us ever thought
*I'm now a sonic cleaner convert!!!
*don't ever be afraid to think out of the box, but be conservative in your moves
*throw you case deburr tool away! I'll let you think on this one a bit
*when buying brass you usually get what you paid for
*fire form with cheap bullets unless you just doing a basic Ackley type chamber
*a great chamber is worthless if the neck, shoulders, and throat are not done as well (you'd be surprised how many great chambers have screwed up throats)
*lap that barrel! Then lap it again! Then relap the first three inches of the barrel after the neck. Always try to have the last three or four inches a couple tenths or so tighter (I learned that from Old Bill Calfee, so once again "Thanks Bill.")
*Just because the folks at Hogdons Powder sas it's a max load don't mean a thing! Some chambers will not take their max load, and some others want another half grain. But be carefull as chamber pressures tend to ramp up fast!!
*accuracey loads rarely correspond with max loads, and you gotta hit it first!
*Junk loading equipment often gives you some more junk. But expensive stuff isn't always best!
*learn to use gauges accurately. Learn to use micrometers in tenths accurately and consistently (I was lucky as my Dad was a toolmaker)
*the most unused word is "WHY?"
*the most overused phrase is "he does it this way."
*we all will eventually get our pinkies on a great shooting piece of iron, so how do we make it better? Be conservative here!
*learn the art of harmonics over the winter months, and then think hard on the subject
*learn about Stuart Otteson, and learn even more
I could do another twenty lines, but I won't
gary
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top