LBEdgin
Well-Known Member
Ok guys which way would you go, I got a desion to make and welcome your impute.
-
If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here
March FX Tactical 4.5x-28x52 via Kahles K525i 5-25x56
- Thread starter LBEdgin
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
Kahles is the "tactical" line for Swarovski in layman's terms. I've never looked through that particular March scope but Kahles makes some very good glass.
Paulstarr
Well-Known Member
This is easy for me,March every time,In own an 8x80x56 and would highly recommend March scopes.
Deputy819
Well-Known Member
I also have the March 'tactical' 8-80x56 and it is by far THE BEST glass I've ever looked through. Its quality edges out both Trijicon's "brilliance" and Nightforce clarity.
Deputy819
Well-Known Member
No breaks for Lance….not even on Christmas!
Brother, he knows we love him.No breaks for Lance….not even on Christmas!
Which Scope March - US Optics - Kahles - Nightforce
I am going to buy a new scope. I'm gonna try to break a habit of buying another Nightforce. I currently own 11 NF's and 4 Leupolds VX6. Nothing wrong with them. Which of these scopes listed above has the clearest view from edge to edge and pure clarity through the magnifications? FYI I like...
Allen Lone wolf
Well-Known Member
Merry Christmas!
dhbikerczar
Well-Known Member
I own a couple March including an FX series. I do not own any Kahles if that tells you anything. I don't think Kahles is really bad or anything, I just think the March are slightly better glass and slightly better built.
I have extensive experience using products from both manufacturers. My first question for you is: what will you be using them for? If you tend to be rough on your equipment, I would recommend Kahles. However, if you take good care of your gear and don't drop or mishandle it, both brands are excellent choices. In my experience, Kahles products can withstand a lot of wear and tear, even under extreme conditions. For F-Class and modified prone shooting, I recommend March optics. Merry Christmas to all!
lancetkenyon
Well-Known Member
Both are good scopes.
To me, March FX has a very slight edge in clarity. Also, the 4.5-28Ă—52WA is something to behold for FOV. 4.5x seems as wide of a FOV and my K318i set on 3x.
The other thing that really takes som getting used to is the top parallax ring. I am so accustomed to a left parallax, I find it difficult to grab the forst time using it when switching back and forth.
I think both turrets are about the same tactile feel and sound, a touch muted compared to some other top end scopes.
The K525i has much better glass than the first Gen K624i.
The availability of a left or right side windage on the Kahles is nice if you want that. I don't, so it doesn't matter.
Kahles are easier to find. And, it is the oldest scope manufacturer still in existence.
March is lighter weight.
Both are bright enough for any legal hunting you might do.
Both are much better than a NF NX8, maybe slightly better than NF ATACR glass.
I would give the robustness edge to Kahles, even though I am pretty careful with my scopes. I also haven't heard any I can recall of either going down.
I like the Kahles reticles better, but either work great.
I think Kahles illumination is a bit brighter on max.
The March High Master glass is far better than their standard "ED" glass. Doesn't even compare.
Honestly, I would buy whichever you can find used. I don't think I would buy either for the "new" asking price of $3200+. But both can usually be found used at decent prices.
To me, March FX has a very slight edge in clarity. Also, the 4.5-28Ă—52WA is something to behold for FOV. 4.5x seems as wide of a FOV and my K318i set on 3x.
The other thing that really takes som getting used to is the top parallax ring. I am so accustomed to a left parallax, I find it difficult to grab the forst time using it when switching back and forth.
I think both turrets are about the same tactile feel and sound, a touch muted compared to some other top end scopes.
The K525i has much better glass than the first Gen K624i.
The availability of a left or right side windage on the Kahles is nice if you want that. I don't, so it doesn't matter.
Kahles are easier to find. And, it is the oldest scope manufacturer still in existence.
March is lighter weight.
Both are bright enough for any legal hunting you might do.
Both are much better than a NF NX8, maybe slightly better than NF ATACR glass.
I would give the robustness edge to Kahles, even though I am pretty careful with my scopes. I also haven't heard any I can recall of either going down.
I like the Kahles reticles better, but either work great.
I think Kahles illumination is a bit brighter on max.
The March High Master glass is far better than their standard "ED" glass. Doesn't even compare.
Honestly, I would buy whichever you can find used. I don't think I would buy either for the "new" asking price of $3200+. But both can usually be found used at decent prices.
Last edited:
Having owned both my vote goes to March....The caveat is everyone's eyes are different. Both scopes will look amazing in the best conditions. It's when the conditions are bad i.e. heavy mirage that truly tells the tell. My advice is get behind both on crappy days then decide which is best for you. The parallax adjustment on the Kahles sucks IMO.
