• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Reduced load, 30/06?

Here ya go, straight from the newest manual i have. Not the best picture
20241124_093522.jpg
 
A couple of ways to approach this.

Use 125 grain load data and find an accuracy node at the bottom of the range using the OCW method. When I do this, I go to the Nosler website and find the powders where the most accurate loads for the powder were the lowest load listed.

I just did that and it suggests that IMR 4831, H414, and IMR 4350 would be good choices. Note, these are not reduced recoil loads just loads at the bottom of the range that will have less recoil.

For a true reduced recoil load, I use the Hodgdon Website. I would have no concerns substituting the 125 SST for the 130 TSX. I have attached a print out of the data. Note, they don't list a range just a single load. When I use this data, I only test 3 charge weights, the listed charge and .4 above and .4 below.
 

Attachments

  • Hodgdon Reduced Load Data 30-06 Barnes 130 TSX.pdf
    126.9 KB · Views: 39
A couple of ways to approach this.

Use 125 grain load data and find an accuracy node at the bottom of the range using the OCW method. When I do this, I go to the Nosler website and find the powders where the most accurate loads for the powder were the lowest load listed.

I just did that and it suggests that IMR 4831, H414, and IMR 4350 would be good choices. Note, these are not reduced recoil loads just loads at the bottom of the range that will have less recoil.

For a true reduced recoil load, I use the Hodgdon Website. I would have no concerns substituting the 125 SST for the 130 TSX. I have attached a print out of the data. Note, they don't list a range just a single load. When I use this data, I only test 3 charge weights, the listed charge and .4 above and .4 below.
Thanks!
 
Top