1wildcatfan
Well-Known Member
Note to self, never buy a Kimber Montana.
Did you bed the action and or free float the barrel?Hey, all I'll say is good luck. I had the exact same rifle, I tried everything I could think of and ideas I found online. I can't remember how many different loads I tried. After being frustrated for a couple years, I sold it. Best decision ever!
I seriously hope you get it figured out
Take Care
From what I read on other forums, the first Oregon made Kimbers were very accurate! I bought my Montana in July of 2006 and after having the accuracy issues and checking the forums, I read the accuracy issues began after Kimber moved to New York which, I believe, was in the mid 90's! I originally bought the Montana because of the Kimber reputation of good accuracy plus I wanted that action! A few tears ago, after I sold my Montana, I read the accuracy issues were over and what was coming out of the Kimber factory was very accurate again! An earlier post in this thread was talking about his Ascent having accuracy issues -- so I wonder if those issues are actually over!Interesting... I have 1980s-era Kimbers (84s in .223 and .17 Mach 4), and early 2000s era 84M Classics (.243, .308, both unfired and NIB). The 80s era rifles shoot 1/2 MOA with factory ammo (Fed Premium 52gr .223, Nosler 25gr BT in Fireball... yes, I checked the chamber). I have shot other early 2000s 84Ms in .243 and .308 and they shot well. I have heard that Kimber quality took a beating over the past decade... is that what it is? Every Kimber rifle and handgun (1911 clones) I fired shot reliably and well, and maybe a couple of customers had minor handgun issues that we corrected at the shop.
They were beautiful rifles but for the larger, more powerful calibers I preferred the New Haven M70 Classics. Not a big fan of light, heavy-recoiling rifles.