I'm hoping it's not fake news. I'll say Russians or the CCP.Rokslide mentioned the video was taken down. I cannot find it. Maybe they wanted to release it later on. ?
Or it was the Russians!
Hmmm, I would need some convincing that numerous ball contact points will take the thrust that bolt lugs would. I love the Blaser idea, but I can't calculate in my head how little ball contact points = contact area, vs lug contact area.
They are relying on pin point contact of the ball in a groove, over many cycles.
They must have confidence in their testing.
I'll sit this one out until someone does a full independent study.
Wa part of it do you believe was a miserable fail? In my opinion they could have done better on the stock, but again considering the pricepoint, I'd be hard pressed to call it a fail.
Omg....not sure which point is more wrong.Your assuming the balls are in a point configuration...
I am ASSUMING they are going into spherical indentations...
There are cannon and rifle barrels using this principal going back 100+ years
As well as industrial presses....
Great idea
You know they HAD TO TEST on 120kpsi to 200kpsi proof loads to market it.....
Right up there with Swiss k30 and hk g1/91 for ingenuity!!!
that has to be one of the ugliest thing I've ever seen!!
[/QUOTE
Uglier than a regular Savage??!!
FEENIX please pass the popcorn.