PEEWEE69
Well-Known Member
Yes for all intended purposes the 300 win mag will work . I'm just wanting something bigger and better. And well different
Yes for all intended purposes the 300 win mag will work . I'm just wanting something bigger and better. And well different
I've not found a down side to a 338, I do like them all but it breaks down like this for me, I've built a number of RUMs and they've all performed excellent, easy going and really fit in budget friendly builds. The 338 Edge is just a little bit more of a good thing but I've not really see the need to build one.
The 338 Lapua has awesome brass, and is all good but if I'm going to do one I'm going all the way and Improving it and grab and easy 150-200 fps for hunting with and shooting to retarded ranges which tends to be a lower round count kind of situation.
The 338 Norma is interesting because it's got good brass, mucho barrel life and while it's slower than the other three if your not wanting to push the range you can set on a sweet load and shoot the heck out for several thousand round which I find attractive gun)
Yes for all intended purposes the 300 win mag will work . I'm just wanting something bigger and better. And well different
That is not a term we use around here since everything is relative... Just because a bullet is bigger does not mean it is in any way "better".
Please don't take this the wrong way, because I am all for the mindset of "Because I can..." or "Because I wanted one..."
But, If your mindset is bigger is better, just go ahead and build a .375 Cheytac or a .50 BMG to hunt whitetails with.
Yes, that was actually mentioned by several members here on the site... I didn't know people needed a rifle with 14,000 ft lbs of muzzle energy to kill a 250 lbs animal... Deer hunters must have had it wrong the last 169 years (since the metatllic cartridge came along).
Plan's are a 1k yrds paper puncher and a 500 plus elk gun