Bob Wright
Well-Known Member
The competition is new and shiny! I'm all for better, but I will keep my LR for a long time.
We offer multiple options to become a Supporting Member here.
Sounds awful . I have one I'm trying out tomorrow with large centerfire, sub 22LR, and bow. If it doesn't miss one like all have been saying….will be the best $ I've spent on reloading ish in a decade.I picked mine up yesterday and it's a sweet little unit. It was usually within 2fps of lab. In 61 shots the biggest spread between the two was 8 fps. It is not finicky at all, I even aimed it slightly away from the target and it still picked up the shot. It is crazy simple to operate and the display is very easy to read and it's completely hassle free with suppressor use. I had another shooter about 5-6 feet to the right of me and it never picked up his shot.
Here is a pic for size reference.
View attachment 503720
I would rather spend the extra 100 or so and get a garminGood time to buy…..supply and demand. Seeing them as low as $475 fully loaded (all primary accessories)……that's a good deal
Still unproven at this Point.I would rather spend the extra 100 or so and get a garmin
I've seen zero negative reviews from over a dozen folks. Not sure what proof you'd like. They are solid though. Guess someone needs to buy the old tech though to enable others to buy new .Still unproven at this Point.
Your all beta testers...lolI've seen zero negative reviews from over a dozen folks. Not sure what proof you'd like. They are solid though. Guess someone needs to buy the old tech though to enable others to buy new .
"A long time". A few months to a select few.Beta testing has been going on long time.
Agreed and also Garmin has had bow sites digital chrono for a long time.Beta testing has been going on long time.
You mean like the 10 years where Lab Radar updated nothing and pretty much blew off any customer wants/needs?"A long time". A few months to a select few.
Mass beta testing is more telling, especially long term.