I responded to this old thread 10 yeas ago claiming the 6.5x284 was my pick for most consistently accurate cartridge. Not much has changed other the I would consider equal billing to the 6.5x47, my go-to competition cartridge.
That 6.5x47 is intriguing me lately. Small rifle primer and rough;y 35 grainers of powder charge seems to be common. 140 gr class bullets that seems to be a lot of performance for fair reasonable cost. Have you noticed any cold temp issues? And I close to accurate on my assessment?I responded to this old thread 10 yeas ago claiming the 6.5x284 was my pick for most consistently accurate cartridge. Not much has changed other the I would consider equal billing to the 6.5x47, my go-to competition cartridge.
I haven't experienced any cold temp issues with my 6.5x47's. For summer competition, I run the CCI BR4 primers. For colder/freezing temps the hotter CCI 450 more then takes care of any cold temp issues and perform just as well in my rifles. IMO, greatest attribute the 6.5x47L is the superb, Lapua case design. While a bit smaller then the 6.5CM it can run at higher pressure, duplicate velocities, and still remain like new with +20 reloads with no annealing, or loose primer pockets. I use the 140's frequently, but the Berger 130 OTM's are fast, and will hold baseball sized groups at 1000 yards. It also performs quite well on medium sized game out to 600 yards.That 6.5x47 is intriguing me lately. Small rifle primer and rough;y 35 grainers of powder charge seems to be common. 140 gr class bullets that seems to be a lot of performance for fair reasonable cost. Have you noticed any cold temp issues? And I close to accurate on my assessment?
My 260 AI should be ready any day now. But now I wonder if I should have went the 6.5x47 route. Seems like an outstanding do all varmint/ deer rifle.I haven't experienced any cold temp issues with my 6.5x47's. For summer competition, I run the CCI BR4 primers. For colder/freezing temps the hotter CCI 450 more then takes care of any cold temp issues and perform just as well in my rifles. IMO, greatest attribute the 6.5x47L is the superb, Lapua case design. While a bit smaller then the 6.5CM it can run at higher pressure, duplicate velocities, and still remain like new with +20 reloads with no annealing, or loose primer pockets. I use the 140's frequently, but the Berger 130 OTM's are fast, and will hold baseball sized groups at 1000 yards. It also performs quite well on medium sized game out to 600 yards.
A couple of 200 yard groups with the 130, and Hornady 140ELDM ..two different rifles..
View attachment 350845View attachment 350846
I don't think you can go wrong with the 260/AI! I used it in competition(142SMK's) with great success long before the 6.5's became the rage! My buddy swears by his 260AI, still using it for competition, and has taken Elk and deer with it out to 700 yards.My 260 AI should be ready any day now. But now I wonder if I should have went the 6.5x47 route. Seems like an outstanding do all varmint/ deer rifle.
I had it built for deer and elk out to 700 yards! But with recent reports I got leery on using it for elk. Now depending on how it shoots I'll consider it again. Thanks Greyfox!!!I don't think you can go wrong with the 260/AI! I used it in competition(142SMK's) with great success long before the 6.5's became the rage! My buddy swears by his 260AI, still using it for competition, and has taken Elk and deer with it out to 700 yards.
If I could only get an AR10 chambered in that.6.5 SAUM. I've had two that were true one-holers.