• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

What is the most overbore cartridge YOU HAVE USED?

Following the calcs of "overbore" - case capacity in grains of water divided by the area of the bore cross section in square inches, I would say my current 22-250AI, the past 22-06 and my old 25-7mmRM.

Since I still use the 22-250AI's, yes, I would do those again, but the 22-06 gave little gains over the 22-250AI and nothing over the 22-243 versions. The old 25-7mmRM was on par with a 257 Wby but without the double radius shoulder and cheaper and more plentiful brass.

Forgot, I did shoot a 50BMG for a few years, so there it that too.
 
Last edited:
For me right now it has to be my 300BO. Just kidding.

My new 6.5x300 Bee is so phenomenal I will never not have one chambered. Remember these overbore chamberings are hunter/killers NOT and I repeat NOT range fodder. Work up load with bullet and put away till hunting season. If you take something in this category to a prairie dog shoot, we'll thats on you. Aiken to having a dodge hellcat burn/smoking tires for 2 minutes straight and your tire blows and complaining WHY DID MY TIRE BLOW. STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES.

LOVE MY 6.5X300 WEATHERBY
 
22CHeetah MK1. Tight neck 80 gr JLK's 3450-3500 1-9" twist 26" bbl. Made 850 rds before it started shredding bullets. Cut off 4" and cut new chamber to use as fireform barrel. Put new 28" 8 twist on it and lost interest in it. Too much work for short brass life. Went to 6-284. Have 1k rds through barrel now and still shoots decent but it's ready for new tires(barrel). Speed comes with a cost just like in cars. 🤣🤣🤣🤣👊
 
When I started building my 6mm/280AI I got a second barrel of it at the same time. I have gone to having a second rifle built to fire form cases for it and my new that coming 25/280AI. From what I have read this moring, it looks like I might be okay on both of them. I also started having reamers built for me, just because I figure I would have to rework the barrels over in a short period of time.
Sometime looking ahead is as clear as mud.
 
Mine was a 6.5-300 Weatherby (WWH) I had built in the early '90s. Ballistics were amazing, throat erosion even more so.

Had it set back after 750 rounds - had to take 2" from the chamber-end, another 1" from the muzzle.
That *was* an amazing (barrel torching) rifle. I remember it not going very many shots between cleanings before a carbon ring/ pressure spike would develop.

But she sure did shoot flat!
 
Building a 25-7PRC currently
In my opinion, not enough attention is paid to Expansion Ratio.

I think a better, more equal, way to compare external ballistics is:

Powder Load / Barrel Volume
where barrel volume = bore squared x barrel length x Pi/4

This gives results most shooters have not seen.

As an example, comparing the ratios of 30-06 charge/barrel vol with 30-378
charge/barrel vol, if you use a 22-in barrel for a 30-06, the same expansion ratio
in a 30-378 yields about a 44-in barrel requirement.

Nobody builds a 30-378 that way, so in my opinion, the 30-378 never gets a fair comparison.

This is only one example.

***EDIT***
I think this is Internal ballistics, not external ballistics.
 
Last edited:
I had the 257 Hot Tomali (STW). It was before I had a Chrono, but it didn't seem any more magical than the Bee and it was pretty picky. I have always though that a 27STW would be about perfect and now maybe running something like a 126 Hammer it would be the ultimate 500 yard "LAZER".
Dr Evil Laser GIF
 
Top