LaHunter
Well-Known Member
Eric Cortina has some good videos discussing this. His info is a good resource and his performance speaks for itself.
An inconsistency resulted from SD=3 and ES=7 to SD=12 and ES=20, i.e., inconsistencies in powder charges between load configuration.
How can a slight different in powder charge level create that change?
Time and data.Question: what causes a low SD/ES?
I was going through notes and .3 grains made a difference of a SD3 ES7 to a SD12 ES20. How can a slight different in powder charge level create that change?
He didn't say he had an inconsistency, he asked how a change in powder charge can cause such a change in SD/ES.
Percentage of powder volume fill; high angle shooting......up versus down versus level.... with excess powder void shifting versus compressed powder loads; temperature variations.....rounds laying in sun versus shade. Rounds in gun at 0F versus rounds inside your parka at 98.6F. Even heavy vibration in ammo transport can contribute to powder packing/shift and ignition/burn variables. Throw your packed up ammo in a pickup bed, some ammo horizontal;some vertical; tip up/down, and drive 25 miles up a rocky rutted washboard road....powder may compact more/differently. So many variables and combinations of variables impact ignition/burn characteristics and thus SD/ES. As FEENIX stated....Consistency is crucial. CONSISTENCY is King...in reloading techniques, ammo handling, every phase of precision, extended range shooting.It all boils down to start pressure. A uniform start pressure equals a curve under MAP that is consistent. A start pressure that fluctuates causes variation in MAP…this is where ES/SD numbers vary causing poor numbers.
There are numerous ways this can be influenced or changed; crimping, seating depth, neck tension and even primer type.
Poor ignition is to be avoided at all costs.
Cheers.
Based on the numbers you give I'm willing to bet you reference 3 shots in each sample. If that's the case the sd's are not statistically different.I was going through notes and .3 grains made a difference of a SD3 ES7 to a SD12 ES20. How can a slight different in powder charge level create that change?
I'm confused….what's your point?Percentage of powder volume fill; high angle shooting......up versus down versus level.... with excess powder void shifting versus compressed powder loads; temperature variations.....rounds laying in sun versus shade. Rounds in gun at 0F versus rounds inside your parka at 98.6F. Even heavy vibration in ammo transport can contribute to powder packing/shift and ignition/burn variables. Throw your packed up ammo in a pickup bed, some ammo horizontal;some vertical; tip up/down, and drive 25 miles up a rocky rutted washboard road....powder may compact more/differently. So many variables and combinations of variables impact ignition/burn characteristics and thus SD/ES. As FEENIX stated....Consistency is crucial. CONSISTENCY is King...in reloading techniques, ammo handling, every phase of precision, extended range shooting.
and .3 grains made a difference of a SD3 ES7 to a SD12 ES20. How can a slight different in powder charge level create that change?
My point was this looks mostly like a small sample size error….Also when you post an sd/es…..how many rounds in the chrono group? By definition, when the sample accurately predicts the population, ES>= 6xSd for a normal distribution.
Sorry….I think.LL! Now you've done it...
This is a good post. If you load more test loads around this area, you can get and idea of the node width by average velocity change per grain and the 5rd sd'. When you think you are close to center node, load 25 and shoot 5 groups of 5 with the same chrono group. How does Sd look now? Still under 10?A wide node is what you need, sure a narrow node works, but as the OP discovered, a small change can disrupt the flow, so to speak.