Weird Deformed brass

Dmagna

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2018
Messages
2,122
Location
New York
What would cause this? Everything is normal pulled it out of the chamber like this,
 

Attachments

  • AF67BEF2-A128-421F-BD1C-A6BF3D274E61.jpeg
    AF67BEF2-A128-421F-BD1C-A6BF3D274E61.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 656
Soot down the neck and what looks like soot around the base. My guess, load didn't build pressure fast enough and gasses got out around the brass. As the case expanded under growing pressure to seal to the walls there became a pocket of gas remaining that could only be compressed so far and the last place it found refuge was right there. If my hypothesis is right then you might want a faster powder or a hotter primer or a heavier bullet.
 
Soot down the neck and what looks like soot around the base. My guess, load didn't build pressure fast enough and gasses got out around the brass. As the case expanded under growing pressure to seal to the walls there became a pocket of gas remaining that could only be compressed so far and the last place it found refuge was right there. If my hypothesis is right then you might want a faster powder or a hotter primer or a heavier bullet.
It's N570 in a 28 nosler shooting 195s. First time it's ever done this.
 
Have had this happen twice with 2 different cartridges.
First was a 25 Pronghorn (25-300WSM) and the second was a 7RUM.
Both times was while working up loads with ZERO data, we were extrapolating from similar sized cases and using slow powders.
Each time was a few grains below what would be a middle load, not a start load.
It is definitely from under ignition, powder starts to burn but lacks enough pressure to give a progressive burn. If we used a faster powder, we would lock the bolt up. It was a difficult set of circumstances.
Increasing the powder charge or using a hotter primer helped us.

Cheers.
 
If the bullet moves to soon from the primer firing , there can be a secondary pressure spike. https://www.shootingtimes.com/editorial/ammunition_st_mamotaip_200909/100079

Standard primers caused no ignition issues at the max load but posted higher extreme variations in pressure and velocity in the lower pressure regimes of the start loads. In extreme cases, the start loads produced short delayed firings — probably in the range of 20 to 40 milliseconds but detectible to an experienced ballistician. Switching that propellant to a Magnum primer smoothed out the performance across the useful range of charge weights and completely eliminated the delays.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top