westcliffe01
Well-Known Member
I have 3 vortex scopes. 4-16x50 PST FFP, 6-24x50 PST FFP and the new 4-16x44 HST. The optical quality of the HST is not on par with the PST scopes, but then its less than half the price. Something has to give somewhere, its a fact of life. All 3 scopes have repeatable reliable turrets. These scopes have replaced my Nikon Monarch scopes. The Monarchs had capped turrets and plain duplex SFP reticles. The Gen 3 and later monarchs have turret caps that cannot be locked so you can easily lose your reference inadvertently and be up a creek. So for me I have reached the end with Nikon.
Leupold seems to be a company with a bipolar product line. On the one hand, very basic scopes with decent glass, basic reticles and capped turrets intended for zeroing. On the other hand, very costly tactical scopes with more options for reticles and target style turrets. Basically no middle ground. Someone at my pay grade feels left out at Leupold. Vortex saw an opening in the middle ground and that is the market they chose to serve first. Since that time they have obviously expanded both downward with "cheap" scopes and upward to compete more directly with Leupold, NF, Zeiss and others.
The HS and PST line of scopes is forcing the historical market leaders to improve their middle ground offering. When I bought the first 4-16x50 PST the waiting time for PST scopes was several months. So that clearly tells a story about how many of these scopes have been sold.
I think you are safe buying a viper class scope. I would not buy the cheaper diamondback scopes. I think you need to spend at least $350+ to get an optic that will have turrets that work.
Leupold seems to be a company with a bipolar product line. On the one hand, very basic scopes with decent glass, basic reticles and capped turrets intended for zeroing. On the other hand, very costly tactical scopes with more options for reticles and target style turrets. Basically no middle ground. Someone at my pay grade feels left out at Leupold. Vortex saw an opening in the middle ground and that is the market they chose to serve first. Since that time they have obviously expanded both downward with "cheap" scopes and upward to compete more directly with Leupold, NF, Zeiss and others.
The HS and PST line of scopes is forcing the historical market leaders to improve their middle ground offering. When I bought the first 4-16x50 PST the waiting time for PST scopes was several months. So that clearly tells a story about how many of these scopes have been sold.
I think you are safe buying a viper class scope. I would not buy the cheaper diamondback scopes. I think you need to spend at least $350+ to get an optic that will have turrets that work.