I have a 4-16x50 Vortex HS-LR FFP (yes, I know its not exactly the same) and a 4.5-14x40 VX3i 30mm CDS (windplex).
I like both, and both fill a specific role that matches the rifle they are mounted on. The HS LR is a bit different than the HS series in terms of features (LR has expsosed turrets and FFP reticle) but the glass is the same. Back to the VX3i vs HS though, both have fit and finish that well exceeds their price range, both have glass that is plenty clear to identify targets and take shots out to (and probably beyond) 1000yds on game sized targets. There is one area though that I feel my VX3i is noticeably better than the Vortex and that is perceived optical clarity and brightness of the image. Again I have never had issues resolving targets with either out to the limits of my own abilities, but the VX3i has a noticeably brighter/more crisp image at all comparable magnifications despite being a 40mm objective vs the 50mm on my Vortex.
I also personally like the CDS on the Leupold vs the BDC reticle on the Vortex HS series (although the Dead Hold reticle is one of the better ones out on the market just because of how clean/uncluttered it is). I've used the CDS paired with the windplex reticle to take game as far as 375yds, mounted on my lightweight hunting rifle in 6.5 Creedmoor. I think in the price range the Leupold is a touch better, but keep in mind that it is also ~$150 more than the Vortex you referenced above.
So I think since you mentioned the base HS (not the LR model) I would go with the Leupold. It has better glass (to my eye), and in my personal opinion a more useful reticle if you opt for the windplex when combined with the CDS (The Vortex Dead Hold BDC is by far one of the better/less cluttered BDC reticles out there but personally I cant stand generic BDC reticles especially on an SFP scope, they just arent very useful unless your conditions/load match what it was calibrated for).