Lots of possibilities for discussion:
Why did this person kill the folks?
How did he get the gun on campus?
What was the reason for the apparent lack of action after the first shooting, "the two hour warning"?
Why did the students apparently non-aggressively await their fate?
Were the handguns (assumed to be the weapons based on reports) just a handy instrument for this event... If this person had had easy access to explosives would that have been used instead??
Why aren't Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) permit holders allowed to carry their personal firearm on campus?
If these CCW holders had been allowed to carry would one or more of them acted to stop this event??
Why don't the police act more quickly??
***********
Why did this person kill the folks?
Who knows what goes on inside someone else's head; maybe the fella just had it in for a couple of the folks (the dorm shooting as I understand) and then decided to go whole-hog. Maybe it was a terrorist (I doubt that scenario). Maybe he was just a nut-case and happened to like the look of the campus??
How did he get the gun on campus?
I'm sure this will come up… If there are restrictions on carrying a gun on campus surely he slipped past security or security was too lax… I say this tongue-in-cheek but someone will surely seriously want to know how it is possible…and what the school (government) is going to do to stop this in the future… (The "let someone else watch out for us" model.)
What was the reason for the apparent lack of action after the first shooting, "the two hour warning"?
I wonder about this… Maybe they thought it was nothing, were the school officials sure there had been a shooting (fatalities) or were they just informed of odd noises??? Did they (whomever) investigate? Were they (the officials) even aware of the first event??
Why did the students apparently non-aggressively await their fate?
This is a hot topic for me… They awaited their fate because they were trained to wait… We (the good old U. S. of A. teaching society) have trained folks to be non-aggressive. Don't start a fight or you'll be expelled. Don't defend yourself or you'll be expelled. Don't talk mean or you'll be expelled. Etc, etc, etc.
This event was a like rabid wolf in a sheep pen and there were no sheep dogs (armed officials) or other wolves (CCW holders allowed to carry, a big guy with a knife, a ball bat) there to offer resistance.
Were the handguns (assumed to be the weapons based on reports) just a handy instrument for this event... If this person had had easy access to explosives would that have been used instead??
If we lived in a place (Iraq for example) where explosives were easy to obtain would this fella have used them, perhaps a suicide vest? The gun was not the problem as I see it, it was just the handiest instrument of sufficient lethality.
Why aren't Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) permit holders allowed to carry their personal firearm on campus?
I believe there are many reasons to doubt the wisdom of carry on campus.
What if a CCW person goes berserk?
What if a CCW person drops their weapon (happens sometimes)?
Would it upset other students to know that some students may be armed?
I believe much of our society has succumbed to the vilification of firearms campaign that has been waged for many years… Guns are bad, people that carry guns are bad, people that like guns are not to be trusted, there is no practical use for a gun, etc.
Folks in our society are not about accepting responsibility or leaving it where it belongs, they're about laying blame. Someone will say "I was injured because the school allowed dangerous equipment on campus" so fire the campus police and president… Example: Metal bats are now being banned because the ball goes too fast when struck with one, sue the school and ban the bats are the answers.
School administration I feel would certainly feel their time on the job would be short if they ever allowed CCW folks to carry on campus. If there were an accident (dropped firearm), firearm visible to a sensitive individual, firearm left in the restroom the first thing to happen would be a new administration… In my opinion it's self preservation on their part but even then something else will arise to bit them in the ***.
The number one reason CCW folks are not allowed to carry (as I see it). A great segment of our society believes that anyone that carries, touches or knows anything about firearms is not stable. This segment of society believes there is something fundamentally wrong with anyone that uses or condones firearms…they see law abiding firearms owners as "nut cases".
If these CCW holders had been allowed to carry would one or more of them acted to stop this event??
I believe there is a possibility that there would have been a significant delay in action against the aggressor but that eventually he would have been confronted and possibly neutralized (killed/wounded). I believe many folks with a CCW have it for the "Cool factor" but there is also a segment that has it for the protection factor. I also believe that if a CCW holder (or multiple) had returned fire there would have been collateral damage and how would that have been dealt with???
Why don't the police act more quickly??
I believe the police do their job well but they are restrained (and taught restraint) by society and the repercussions of previous actions. They must await evaluation of the situation, they're not the "old west" Marshall that rolls into the saloon and blasts the bad guy. They require situation reports and identification of the "perp", heaven forbid if they'd incorrectly shoot an armed friendly or a hostage. I believe they live with the realization that they could save the day and ruin the rest of their life to the second guessers.