Roy,
Generally the OCW or "round robin" work-up gets you to a stable, predictable charge weight. From that charge weight, you can then use other techniques to further tighten ES. Seating depth changes improve accuracy, and primer changes will often help to improve extreme spread. Of course you're already aware of this--I just mention this for the sake of others who may read this thread who aren't up to speed on such things...
The last OCW load I worked up at 100 yards shot MOA at 1000 yards the first time I tried it, and in good wind conditions it has stayed under 1.5 MOA at 1060 yards in times since. Other loads have performed well at 1K also, perhaps needing only a primer swap or depth adjustment, or segregated brass, etc.--but not a powder charge adjustment. This isn't to say that altering the powder charge can't make a 2 MOA 1000 yard load go to 1 MOA--just that I believe it is best to leave the powder charge alone--once properly identified as Optimal, and tune the load then in other ways. I say this because if you do alter the powder charge to tighten a proven OCW load, you'll move to the edge of the "sweet spot" and be forever "walking the tightrope" to accuracy. Better to leave the powder charge be, and make your accuracy gains via other means (seating depth, primer swaps, neck tension, etc.)...
My long range .308 load which was identified at 100 yards via the OCW method has been a consistent MOA performer at 600 yards. (Note that when I say consistent MOA performer, I'm talking about under ideal conditions. Testing in calm winds and good light allows me to know what the load and rifle are capable of, and then I can go shoot under "not so ideal" conditions and know that blown shots are likely all my fault--not likely the fault of the rifle or load recipe).
Basically, if you believe in the virtue of the ladder test, the OCW test is simply a way to do the same thing with more reliable, statistically superior results. Then, as you mention, you can move on to the more intricate steps of accuracy improvement. You'll be building higher on the firmer foundation of a very stable powder charge, if that makes sense.
I've seen the standard Audette ladder test produce good results--but just as often I've seen it yield confusion. "Did I pull shot number 9? Heck, shots 7, 8 and 10 are all nearly touching. Hmmm..." You get the idea. But with OCW round robin, you've got three shots at each charge weight, and the error factor--courtesy of the round robin firing sequence--is spread as evenly as possible across all charge weights being looked at.
Thanks for the interest,
Dan