• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Tikka vs. Savage

Good and bad points being made. The T3 only has one length mag so you have a lot of room with a 308, enough room with a 30-06 and a little short for the 300WM. The other big difference is twist rate, the Tikka will be twisted slower than the Savage.
 
I have both a Tikka t3 and a Savage 110. I would pick the Tikka every time. Action is the smoothest of any production rifle, crazy accurate out of the box. there are more and more aftermarket accessories for these great rifles. Factory trigger is fantastic. Crisp, light with no creep. Boyds, McMillian,Manners all make stocks for them. Action is very strong and tight. putting a new tube on is no more difficult than any other. Savages shoots 1.5 moa , Tikka .5 moa. apple to apples, Tikka wins in my opinion

Ill have to disagree with your savage accuracy claim. My completely stock savage shoots SUB 1.5" at 500 yards. With no wind I can get it down around an inch. That is completely factory with just hand loads.
 
I have both a Tikka t3 and a Savage 110. I would pick the Tikka every time. Action is the smoothest of any production rifle, crazy accurate out of the box. there are more and more aftermarket accessories for these great rifles. Factory trigger is fantastic. Crisp, light with no creep. Boyds, McMillian,Manners all make stocks for them. Action is very strong and tight. putting a new tube on is no more difficult than any other. Savages shoots 1.5 moa , Tikka .5 moa. apple to apples, Tikka wins in my opinion

have only shot one Tikka, and it was in .270 Winchester. With hand loads it shot 3/4" three shot groups. Never shot a Savage in .270, so can't compare them. But have shot several in 30-06, and every one did better than 3/4" five shot groups. The Tikka is a fine rifle for sure, and about equal to a good 700ADL, but not close to a Howa. The fit of metal to wood looked good, but so does the Savage. The finish on the Tikka looked cheap. I'll take a Howa seven days a week over the Tikka! Now to take this a step further. I own too many 30-06's, and have had several others in the past. My favorite are two Weatherbys. A MK.V. light weight, and a Vanguard. The Vanguard will shoot sub inch groups at two hundred yards with factory loads. The MK.V will shoot five shots effortlessly in the mid to high sixes with 165 grain bullets (all for about $550). I have a Marlin MR-7 in 30-06, and with zero load development it shoots right at 3/4" for five shots.

If I had a Savage that shot 1.5" moa, I'd send it back as that doesn't meet there spec. Same for Weatherbys. Lastly; if you think that Tikka is smooth, then try a Blazer.
gary
 
I òwn (4) tikkas and (4) savages. Everyone of my tikkas is a sub moa gun. (3) of my savages are sub moa guns. Would I spend $1400 plus on a savage... No. I did and would again on a tikka... got a t3 tactical and it is an amazing gun. Now... I really like the savages that I have... But wouldn't even dream of trading one of my tikkas for a savage. Not a chance. I'm sure some would say that they wouldn't trade their savage for a tikka.... But I own both... And the tikkas are just in a different category quality-wise to me... And when I buy or own a gun... what matters is how I feel about the rifle/pistol.

Savages are and can be excellent shooting guns... But I think the tikka IS an excellent gun.... Neither compares to some of the top tier guns... But for base models... The tikka t3 lite is a lot for the money.

Get your hands on both... Side by side... And see which feels right to you. You might end up with the savage... I have... And they fit their nitch in my gun closet, but I think it'll be hard to say that the savage feels like a higher quality gun than the tikka.

Just my opinion.

OK, I could care less about the Fords verses Chevies argument. But $1400 rang a bell. Compare the Tikka whatever it is with a Savage LRP. It won't begin to run with that big dog! Then add three hundred dollars and buy a custom shop rifle in whatever caliber you have a whim for. The proof targets for these rifles always come in under a quarter inch with off the shelf Federal ammo. High ones are common place with them (proof targets)
gary
 
If you are comparing a $500 gun to a 2500-6k gun, I think that says A LOT about that $500 gun. Might as well compare a ford escort to aston martin vanquish.

Strictly commenting on the action the tikka takes it hands down, smooth as glass and 90* bolt (mine does anyway). Accuracy can be had several ways and can be argued until the next century. I wish tikka had more options as I'd be building a custom on that action instead of a 700.
 
have only shot one Tikka, and it was in .270 Winchester. With hand loads it shot 3/4" three shot groups. Never shot a Savage in .270, so can't compare them. But have shot several in 30-06, and every one did better than 3/4" five shot groups. The Tikka is a fine rifle for sure, and about equal to a good 700ADL, but not close to a Howa.

Just some thoughts:

The 145gr LRX is lights out in my Tikka (3shot @ 100yds covered by a dime, 5 shot at 200yds was 1.25" factoring out a 3rd shot called flyer, 2.62" with it). That gun/combo is capable of shooting better than I can shoot it at the moment.

I've heard good things on savages and would like to sit down and shoot one to really feel it. My handling impressions haven't tempted me enough to purchase one myself to date. I haven't ruled them out but like the feel of some others better (though I love the DIY ability they seem to offer).

But like most guns you get good ones and bad ones, also the shooter finding a great load is what turns a 1MOA gun into a sub 1/2MOA gun at times.

Fit/finish on a Tikka is way above a 700ADL, trigger is much smoother, bolt is much smoother, etc. Factory stock is accurate/functional even if it does feel a bit cheap (not as cheap as some other folks though). I also shot a clover leaf over the weekend with my rem700 but its an older model that was done to current BDL standards, has a timney trigger installed, and is in a bedded composite stock... Bonus though is it can take long COAL's in the blind mag where as the tikka mag can't (however mine shoots fine for me so I guess if it ain't broke...).
 
Not just for the price savage is awesome! It's not the smoothest action but smooth enough. Accuracy is its number one seller, and accuracy is what you get. Savage is an all around gun that you can spend a couple bucks and not regret your purchase in the long run. As far as personal preference, my favorite of all time is my Rugar Mark II 7mm Rem Mag. So I know the difference between a high quality rifle and a budget rifle. And for the price of a budget rifle savage has the best to offer in that category no matter what caliber hands down.
 
I've only handled and shot one Tikka. It was very pretty and very smooth. But with his best handloads that he can muster my savage will shoot circles around his Tikka. his savage will also outshoot his Tikka by a good margin. So that tells me something. Given the choice of pretty or accurate I'd take the accurate one every time.

Now the Tikka is plenty accurate enough to kill something with but it won't win any trophies.
 
Ok, all of you, thank you for your input and personal opinions! Accuracy is/was not the critical issue here, as I do handload and I am/was willing to put the load development time in! I made my decision based on twist, mag length, and stock options, not "Ford vs. Chevy" haha. And yes, I have had the rifle over 4+ years now!!!

I'm sure the Tikka is a wonderful rifle, but I bought the Savage 116 with the detachable box mag/AccuTrigger/AccuStock, and I have never looked back! The only modifications I had done were bolt fluting and a tactical handle. It shoots awesome with literally just about every bullet I have tried, from 100 gr. to the 168 gr. VLD. The best is about 0.25" 4-shots consistently (with cool down time between shots) with the 140 gr. Berger VLD, also ES with that load is consistently between 4-13 fps.

All that being said, I had several Savage rifles before that, and will probably own more down the road. I also have a Marlin, some Remingtons, some Winchesters, and one custom rifle build off a Howa action that I absolutely LOVE! I am not exactly super "brand partial" but it is nice when you can get something that you want without compromising!

Thank you all again.
 
I've only handled and shot one Tikka. It was very pretty and very smooth. But with his best handloads that he can muster my savage will shoot circles around his Tikka. his savage will also outshoot his Tikka by a good margin. So that tells me something. Given the choice of pretty or accurate I'd take the accurate one every time.

Now the Tikka is plenty accurate enough to kill something with but it won't win any trophies.

I am going to stop here and say I own both savages and tikkas that I reload for... And there is no way the savages shoot circles around the tikkas when it comes to accuracy. When I get the load right... Which has been fairly easy with both... The savages and the tikkas are extremely accurate rifles... Minus one savage that refuses to shoot anything well. Lemons are possible with any manufacturer so I don't hold this against savage.

However... That being said... To me, the tikka still feels more refined in the hand.... Period.

Sorry... But the savage is more accurate than the tikka is a bunch of hooie. I've got 4 of each and they are all fine shooters minus the 1 savage. I'd have a tough time saying one brand was more accurate than the other with reloaded ammo. With factory ammo... The tikkas tend to shoot slightly better groups than my savages... But not so much that I would lean to one brand over the other.

Savage is a good value gun for their price point. Tikka is a good value gun for their price point.

I think that your limited experience with tikka is telling you something that doesn't reflect the overall tikka experience. That you are sharing it with others based on very little time behind one gun and one users reloaded ammo is imprudent. To tout savage as being superior accuracy-wise to tikka is absolutely inaccurate.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top